Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> And honestly I don't think any significant amount of people search Google images wanting Pinterest results.

Sure they do, if the picture on Pinterest is relevant to the search term; they wouldn't have clicked on the thumbnail if it wasn't close to (or exactly) what they were looking for.

The issue isn't that people don't want Pinterest, it's that they don't want the closed nature of Pinterest, and even then, it's less an issue with Pinterest and more just a closed web problem in general. Consider certain IT vendors who won't even let you look at their documentation without being a current customer or handing actual information over to a Sales Rep and having it verified, or forums that hide their content behind logins or paywalls. Pinterest is a big target because it's big and has a lot of artsy stuff that might be useful for a simple project, but you can replace Pinterest with dozens of sites and the same rants would apply. The Reddit post to me feels like it's railing against an easy target rather than the actual problem of a consistently closed web with absurd demands for access.



Almost all the images on Pinterest are available elsewhere. If Pinterest results were not polluting Google images, the originals would surface easier.

---

I don't really see a problem with targeting the biggest worst abuser. Not everything has to be a one-shot solution to grand problems.


'...the originals would surface easier'

Yes, exactly. Try and find the original version of most images these days and you'll just go around in circles.

If Google really think Pinterest need to be in search results (I'm talking text based queries here) why on Earth do they need to return 3 results on page one, all leading to a Pinterest log-in page?


should replace the result~~s~~ with login/register links.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: