No, you, and the author, are assuming the antecedent which we have to do to make your question relevant. If we do assume that what is done in public, which you've willfully involved a 3rd party in, is somehow 4th amendment protected- it isnt and never has.
In the 90s, people made a decision to increase the speed from 60mph to 65mph knowing it would kill people. Based on point one, many leaders are murderers, but we typically don't view our leaders as murderers.
My question is why is it bad if some "terrorist" does it if people we know do it, it isn't a bad thing.
I write text in a text editor all day but would still upgrade my machine on a regular basis. I have a Threadripper and use all 32 cores everyday. I'm still debating on whether or not to upgrade to the new generation released yesterday. 4 year old CPUs are not speedy.
You'd be surprised at just how slow running zellij in iTerm was on an Intel MBP. Somehow in 2023 we've managed to create resource hungry text interfaces.
