If I lose my job and fail to get another one in reasonable time, I guess I'll try my own business, if that also fails it might be the rope then.

At least I am not tied by family so I can be relatively mobile, I moved to Singapore from my European country since the market was not great and I managed to get hired here.

Anyway in my current company the bottlenecks are completely different than AI so it will take a fair amount of time to even apply AI properly to development here.

Do really understand deeply and in great amount I feel we would need models with changing weights and everyone would have their own so they could truly adjust to the user. Now we have have chunk of context that it may or may not use properly if it gets too long. But then again, how do we prevent it learning the wrong things if the weights are adjusting.

In principle you're right but these things can get probably 60-70% of the job done. The rest is up to "you". Never rely on it blindly as we're being told kind of... :)

And midwits here saying "yeah bro they have some MUCH better model internally that they just don't release to the public", imagine being that dense. Those people probably went all in on NFTs too and told other "you just don't get it bro"

They should make Opus Extended Extended that routes it to actual person in a low cost country.

Artificial AI.

Yes, my brain is just like an LLM.

Lmao, and this is what they are saying will be an AGI in 6 months?

There's probably a comedy film with an AGI attempting to take over the world with its advanced grasp of strategy, persuasion and SAT tests whilst a bunch of kids confuse it by asking it fiendish brainteasers about carwashes and the number of rs in blackberry.

(The final scene involves our plucky escapees swimming across a river to escape. The AIbot conjures up a speedboat through sheer powers of deduction, but then just when all seems lost it heads back to find a goat to pick up)

There is a Soviet movie, "Teens in the Universe" [0], where teens cause robots' brains to fry by giving them linguistic logical puzzles.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teens_in_the_Universe

This would work if it wasn’t for that lovely little human trait where we tend to find bumbling characters endearing. People would be sad when the AI lost.

Maybe infusing the AI character with the boundless self confidence of its creators will make it less endearing :)

What’s wrong with having a bittersweet movie?

In the excellent and underrated The Mitchells vs the Machines there's a running joke with a pug dog that sends the evil robots into a loop because they can't decide if it's a dog, a pig or a loaf of bread.

This theme reminds me of Blaine the Mono from the Dark Tower series

There is a Star Trek episode where a fiendish brainteaser was actually considered to genocide an entire (cybernetic, not AI) race. In the end, captain Picard choose not to deploy it.

But “PhD level” reasoning a year ago.

Yes, get ready to lose your job and cash your UBI check! It's over.

Laughable indeed.

One thing that my use of the latest and greatest models (Opus, etc) have made clear: No matter how advanced the model, it is not beyond making very silly mistakes regularly. Opus was even working worse with tool calls than Sonnet and Haiku for a while for me.

At this point I am convinced that only proper use of LLMs for development is to assist coding (not take it over), using pair development, with them on a tight leash, approving most edits manually. At this point there is probably nothing anyone can say to convince me otherwise.

Any attempt to automate beyond that has never worked for me and is very unlikely to be productive any time soon. I have a lot of experience with them, and various approaches to using them.

They seem to have stopped talking about AGI and pivoted to ads and smut.

This was probably wise, because ads and smut are well understood, and known to exist.

Well in fairness, the "G" does stand for "General".

In fairness, they redefined it away from "just like a person" to "suitable for many different tasks".

I think this lack of 'G' (generality, or modality) is the problem. A human visualizes this kind of problem (a little video plays in my head of taking a car to a car wash). LLM's don't do this, they 'think' only in text, not visually.

A proper AGI would have have to have knowledge in video, image, audio and text domains to work properly.

Show me a robotic kitten then, in six months. As smart and learning.

I used to think this sounds crazy but I am thinking a bit that being a billionaire corrupts you in the sense that normal things don't do it anymore for you and it's just more and more depravity.

Humans have been corrupted by power since power structures have existed, why would it be any different now.

The depravity also gets served up to you on a silver platter when you are at that level.

Ethnic Jewish supremacist as clearly evidenced by the email but very little reporting in the media. Complete racist also. I wonder if this was how he and his goons told themselves that it's okay to traffic the women from the former Soviet Union and other poor parts of the world, maybe they thought the girls were below them in every way possible.

I am quite black pilled on this but this shit probably won't go anywhere because a certain country is heavily implicated in the operation and the media is very very hard trying not to say that name.

Trump is now preparing to fight Iran on their behalf lmao.

I have no respect for any of these goons anymore. Those people asking him for advice in emails AFTER his conviction. Frankly they all should be fired but probably won't and it shows the justice system is mostly for the plebs.

I don't know, Opus 4.6 cannot solve a synchronization issue in my game which is not that big. It comes with tons of wrong analysis and implementations that make it worse.