I wonder if that has always been the case or if it is a modern thing (modern in the sense of our evolutionary history).

Why do you have a bank? Don’t you use crypto for all your needs? Or does crypto fail you in that?

No one actually accepts crypto

Def start with Phoenix first and then try Ash.

It’s not an american company.

Amazing. I had not noticed they support websockets now. That was always what I missed from CF.

I haven’t tried to do SSR in bunny but they also have bunny magic containers now where you run an entire container instead of just edge scripts (but still at the edge).

It should work as a drop in. You can just proxy your website. You don’t need to upload anything to Bunny (but you can if you want).

Out of 450 000 pieces I bet 440 000 pieces are just pottery shards and other ”boring” things. Important for history etc but no one wants to go to a museum with 400 000 almost identical pieces of pottery shards and similar. Only a tiny amount will be things the public wanna see in a museum.

> Out of 450 000 pieces I bet 440 000 pieces are just pottery shards and other ”boring” things

That's certainly super optimistic of you.

Yeah, it's probably more like 449,000 are pottery/ceramics.

Be kinda cool if they made wall mosaics at the respective stations out of them or something.

So true. Folks used pots for tens of thousands of years, and used them mostly like disposable dinnerware. They broke, daily, and got tossed out the window. A settlement of a dozen roundhouses might have a million sherds, depending on how long it persisted.

All US companies selling to European customers have to comply with GDPR. European companies selling only to non-European customers don’t have to comply with GDPR. It’s all about who your users are. Not where your company is registered.

I think what OP means is that a US company cannot simultaneously comply with the CLOUD act and the GDPR. That case has also been made by some courts in the EU, that US law and practice are incompatible with the requirements of the GDPR. US companies who claim to process data in accordance with the GDPR seem to be deceiving their customers. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me that companies in the EU who rely on US services, corporations in the US, and even governments themselves keep quit about this unpleasant truth. It means that Microsoft Windows violates the GDPR, Google violates it, every US social network violates it, etc.

Of course, as someone else mentioned, that is not an argument against EU sovereignty but rather one of its motors.

> European companies selling only to non-European customers don’t have to comply with GDPR.

Usually they do. European company processing personal data of non-EU customers falls with article 3(1) "This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not."

Of course if they do not process any personal data then it wouldn't apply but that's pretty unlikely (and if that was the case the EU customers data wouldn't fall within GDPR either).

Cool. Would love a write up about how you did it if you have time

+1 on wanting a writeup. The model architecture choices alone would be interesting - did they use a transformer, CNN, or something hybrid? And how they handled the tone pair ambiguities... Would read that blog post for sure.