Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tomkaos's commentslogin

I read somewhere that he could have change human sleep. Human can have a deeper sleep knowing a guard will alert of danger.

Thankfully we have those other animals, "human puppies", to counteract this :P

I know it’s said in jest, but if your kid is attached while you’re sleeping, i.e. breastfeeding and cosleeping, which a hunter gatherer society would most certainly do, babies don’t fuss unless they’re sick or something. My wife slept soundly through the night and said “it’s amazing she doesn’t feed at night!” (Referring to our daughter), and I said, shocked, “she eats at night, she makes a soft noise and you just roll over and pop a boob in her mouth without waking up!” This is entirely a modern problem of our own creation and convenience.

I avoid cron job at this time for this reason and for many other random problem because 3:00 am seem to be often choose for a maintenance like automatic update, server reboot, database backup..


Can be tricky: an old project had a job that ran every 15 minutes to poll data from a popular smart thermostat company. I always knew when DST was starting or ending because that job would throw an error email at 2/3am on those days.


Same thing with image model. 4 Go stable diffusion model can draw and represent anything humanity know.


How about a full glass of wine? Filled to the brim.


Not really useful when it's not support on most recent Firefox version.


Sounds like a total win for Firefox! Hope it stays this way.

Use Firefox! It does not support sites that make you physically ill when you scroll them!


The number of devs that see something isn't supported on FF and do something other than shrug their shoulders is probably me and one other person on the internet. Maybe. It could just be me.

I don't think that moves the needle much on if people care it doesn't work in FF.


> The number of devs that see something isn't supported on FF and do something other than shrug their shoulders is probably me and one other person on the internet. Maybe. It could just be me.

The number is likely extremely close to the number of Firefox users.


And yet you missed the self-deprecating humor in acknowledging FF users is such a small number, it's me and one other person. Did you think that was a literal number I believed to be true?


My (personally) humorous interpretation was that they were extending your joke by implying the only users using FF are devs and they are the ones that care.


Depends on the region. In Germany for example, Firefox has higher market share (around 10%) than Edge or Samsung Internet.


If Firefox does release support, it shouldn’t be long before adoption is widespread: > Since Mozilla throttles the rollout of a new version (incrementally upgrading the percentage of the population getting upgrades), it takes about four weeks for about 70% of clients to upgrade before stabilizing.

https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity


Unrelated but from that link "But why profiles? Why not just measure new user rate? Because we don't track users." is a weird thing to write after showing Monthly Active Users.


I have travel entire Vietnam with people with kids. After seeing all the pagoda, park, cave, amusement park.. the best part of the travel for the kid was the pool at one hotel.


Still use my gen 1, the best 20$ spend in my life. I just have a annoying bug with youtube video that google won't fix.


And Android Pay, I forgot my wallet one day, decide to use Android Pay but was block with : "Android Pay is replace by Google Pay, you need to update...". The shame of not been able to pay loose ma confident to use Google for this.


Some people think it's legit because they pay for the service and the decoder (firestick with a app) is sold in a real store.


yeah I've talked to those cell phone shop guys that sell them, just for fun to see how it works, and they definitely dont explain what it actually is to you


You probably get a better control on what a happen with the data. I have the impression that GTP-4 is more of a black box and privacy problem.


GPT-4 on Azure has the exact same privacy situation as Mistral on Azure. Microsoft hosts the models on its own servers.


This probably became cheaper and simpler to put a camera than a real code bar scanner.


Confirmed. Most (all?) "2D barcode scanners" are cameras.

It is also way cheaper to get off-the-shelf tablets with camera to embed into systems, then add extra hardware to read just barcodes.


Yeah I think this is the best explanation - I've used "cafeteria cards" before with RFID or NFC, so QR didn't even occur to me.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: