They point to their comparison page to claim similar quality. First off it's very clear that the details are way less, but worse, look at the example "Three-quarters front view of a yellow 2017 Corvette coming around a curve in a mountain road and looking over a green valley on a cloudy day."
The Original model shows the FRONT, the speed version shows the BACK of the corvette. It's a completely different picture. This is not similar but strikingly different.
Notice that with the higher ranked car brands you usually get two years or more of "special service" on purchase. Something along the lines of "for any problem just call this number and we will help you immediately!". That's how they don't show up in the statistics because the brand itself will handle it and not - like in this example - the ADAC. My company even has a compliance form you have to sign before getting a car from the pool to agree to not call ADAC or similar at any circumstance, no matter the problem. Always call the given brand number. Reason is to keep their statistics low (and in exchange our leasing prices ...)
What strikes me is the comment on 3DS challenges that passed.
By law in Europe, once 3DS challenge is completed the Bank owns the risk and cost of the chargeback NOT the Online Shop. Can someone tell me how this is implemented in common processors ? Any experience?
What strikes me in this "comments/rebuttals" is that they mostly miss Moxies' main points and underlying critic. Some comments are pretty obvious and certainly understood my moxie...
