Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thg's commentslogin

It was just another marketing stunt to pump the stock price before their terrible earnings report. One "unsupervised" unit, with the supervisor in a follow car, that nobody could actually get and drive around in.

https://electrek.co/2026/01/28/teslas-unsupervised-robotaxis...



They're declining worldwide and since Musk got the climate change denier elected who did away with CAFE credits at the end of Q3, Tesla is now also no longer a profitable company.


> Tesla is now also no longer a profitable company

We won’t know this until the end of January [1]. (Tesla turned a $1.4bn profit in Q3.)

[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/prediction-elon-musk-reveal-t...


For the last few quarters, Tesla was only profitable due to their selling CAFE credits. With those gone and their sales declining, it's all but certain that Tesla will post a loss for Q4, unless they resort to some very creative accounting tricks.


Tesla was only profitable the last few quarters due to selling their carbon credits to other companies. They'd have lost money otherwise. And since Trump basically did away with that, Tesla is no longer a profitable company now.


Geely owns Volvo Car AB. Volvo Trucks is a different company and part of the Volvo Group, which is not owned by Geely (but they are a big shareholder).


Volvo group is listed on the stock exchange , Geely has less than 5% of the shares https://www.volvogroup.com/en/investors/the-volvo-share/owne...


They couldn't even if they wanted to, because that scam was shut down in 2011.


Doesn't help the op, but I use my Nikon Z6 II as a webcam under Fedora and have been doing this for a few months now, mostly without any problems.

Here's a guide for those interested (not by me): https://www.crackedthecode.co/how-to-use-your-dslr-as-a-webc...


That's a link to this discussion.


Gah - didn't spot that - this was originally posted 7 days ago, but seems to have been refreshed by dang - if you search 'honey' you'll see it was originally a thread 7 days ago , and note that some of the comments here are multidays old.


Various mod intercession can cause old submissions to be re-upped. Usually that's through the Second Chance Pool, though this submission doesn't seem to have gone that route.

<https://news.ycombinator.com/pool>


Previous discussion of this discussion here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42351886


The traffic limit is outbound only. There is no limit on inbound / internal traffic. So even if they were to hit you with a 5TB / month limit, you'd be just fine.

https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/general/traffic/ (bottom of the page)


This is correct. No idea why it was flagged. Hetzner only counts outbound traffic.


Not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for, but I suppose it will be of at least some help: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tf4qx1aMJp8Lo_R6gpT6...


Quoted from the second paragraph:

> the new laws not only bolster those existing protections but extend them to everyone in California — not just to people working in front of a camera in Hollywood


> digital replica of an individual’s voice or likeness in place of the individual’s actual services,

That seems to indicate performers only. Not just anyone. Doesn't it, since it's taking about services.


The bill says

> ...between an individual and any other person for the performance of personal or professional services is unenforceable...

The bill then goes on to define "digital replica".

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: