I really enjoyed reading through [1] as it gives a lot of insight into what goes into making a font. However I wonder what incentives does IBM have for putting this much work into making it public, accessible and widely used. Wouldn't the ubiquity of the font make it less strong for their brand identity?
The presentation is fantastic and I loved the interactive examples!
Too bad that all of this effort is spent arguing something which can be summarised as "add structured tags to your logs"
Generally speaking my biggest gripe with wide logs (and other "innovative" solutions to logging) is that whatever perceived benefit you argue for doesn't justify the increased complexity and loss of readability.
We're throwing away `grep "uid=user-123" application.log` to get what? The shipping method of the user attached to every log? Doesn't feel an improvement to me...
P.S. The checkboxes in the wide event builder don't work for me (brave - android)
Do you really loose the ability to grep? You can still search for json fragments `grep '"uid": "user-123"' application.log`
If the json logged isn't pretty printed everything should still be on one line. You can also grep with the `--context` flag to get more surrounding lines.
Hi, I'm a full-stack engineer with around 3 years of experience. Past projects include being a team lead for a NextJS/.NET application on Kubernetes for a leading company in the Sports industry, where I oversaw all phases of the development from planning to delivery. Currently working as a team lead for application modernization projects at Deloitte. Standard tasks include code migration from COBOL to Java, communication with the Product Team and the clients, interface implementation and delivery management for large scale projects.
Willing to learn and adapt and open to any opportunities, but would like to work on B2C products with a user-centric focus!
Hi, I'm a Software Developer with a passion for cutting-edge technology, I have experience in working with Kubernetes, NextJS, and JavaScript to build and deploy scalable and reliable applications. Currently, I am involved in the migration of legacy mainframe applications from Cobol to cloud-native Java. I'd be interested in switching to a more coding focused role. Feel free to reach out!
At the moment I'm looking for fully remote positions because of personal reason that are forcing me to relocate.
I am familiar with this situation and agree it is a problem. But this is a deterministic, well known, algorithm rather than AI, isn't it? I would also say that this falls under bias rather than misalignment. I think bias is a much, much more realistic problem area than misalignment.
This is exactly what I'm talking about in the other response to your previous comment. The joke goes "AI ceases to be AI when we start to understand how it works".
But it doesn't matter if you call the software that kills us all "conscious AI that was misaligned" or if it was "deterministic code that had a bug" - the underlying problem that we're all dead remains the same. We're just arguing about labels instead of issues.
The AI that kills us all (if this happens) will very likely be a simple, deterministic algorithm that ran on A LOT of data.
Constructive criticisms are welcome.
If someone doesn't want to login it's fine.
If someone doesn't want to login and explains the reason behind it and what could be a proper solution then that comment is helpful and worth discussing.
ChatGPT has no ads because it's a free tech demo (see GPT-3, DALLE-2). It's almost sure that as soon as it gets out of the demo there will be a pricing model.
Google is free and has to pay for its costs. The question on how to make a Google with no ads has already been answered by kagi.com
It depends on the players, but for how the game is structured you still have a good chance of "winning" (finishing alive with in a draw) even if you're way underpowered, as long as you're friendly and provide some value
It's also bad form to resign even if you have no hope and will be finished off in the next few turns, because it will inevitably favour one of your opponents not to have to worry about you at all.
Yes, and it's totally kosher to say "if you stab me on this turn I will order 'all units hold' until the end of the game" - equivalent to resigning.
But it's not OK to irrevocably commit to that decision, by, say, leaving the room and driving home.
I think this is true even in groups that take quite a liberal approach to gamesmanship and what might be cheating in other games: intentionally submitting illegal orders, peeking at other players' orders, etc. I don't know how to reconcile this logically other than by saying the game only works when all players are trying to win. Some would go further and say the game only works when most or all players are trying for a solo victory, since if you can be certain several players are happy with a 3 or 4-way draw that will always be the outcome.
