Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | spacemanspiff01's commentslogin

Is it a voice to voice model, or a voice->text->voice?

I might have missed it in their writeup.


Anyone know the tokens/sec for llm inference?


How about Nvidia, they have both good hardware/software.


For those who wondered what gravity had to do with this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_wave


After reading, it turns out gravity waves are just 99%+ of regular waves on the ocean

I’m utterly befuddled by that term

Feels a bit like another LoRa vs LoRA situation, but in reverse this time


In the field of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics it is an important distinction as there are other very important waves. Rossby waves are not gravity waves and extremely important to the global climate (see their role in ENSO dynamics). Compressive waves (acoustic waves) are everywhere of course. There are also topographic Rossby waves, internal waves and Kelvin waves (note: kelvin waves and internal waves are gravity waves as well). Oh, and inertial waves!


Hubble just spotted a "bullseye" galaxy where a smaller galaxy passed through the center and caused ripples in the gas bobbing with gravity, like dropping a stone in a pond:

https://www.earth.com/news/bullseye-galaxy-reveals-stunning-...


This is my thought, sure a lot of VCs will lose a lot of money as they write things off.

But it's not like people are going to throw out all the Nvidia hardware they bought.

And there are ai applications that I can think of that would be viable at 100x cheaper price.


So, on the plus side, assuming that the absurd aspects get ironed out, couldn't this be a good thing.

Businesses that rely on open source software will either have to accept liability for defects, or contract out to a third party who accepts liability.

That seems like it might encourage open-source business models that encourage selling support, even just for the liability protection.

Or am I being too hopeful?


In addition to what others have said, Often from a network perspective you want smaller range.

At the end of the day, there is a total speed limit of Mb/s/Hz.

For example, in cities, with a high population density, you could theoretically have a single cell tower providing data for everyone.

However, the speed would be slow, as for a given bandwidth six the data is shared between everyone in the city.

Alternatively, one could have 100 towers, and then the data would only have to be shared by those within range. But for this to work, one of the design constraints is that a smaller range is beneficial, so that multiple towers do not interfere with each other.


What language?


I used to pick new languages when I started projects with AI for learning but lately I've been using ruby for everything possible and I generally prefer it's output as it writes stuff more idiomatically than I do (out of laziness)


Ah, I was curious if o1 is running code in background and doing an error loop.


The security risk comes from all those unvetted plugins, that have unrestricted access to the editor.


That's an issue with any plugin system, right? AFAIK no IDE has a plugin system with capabilities or a sandboxed interpreter.

VSCode does have a thing where it's like do you trust the authors of this project. Not sure what it does because I've never had to use it. From StackOverflow[1]:

>If you select No, I don't trust the authors, Visual Studio Code will open the workspace in 'restricted mode'. This is the default for all new workspaces. It lets you safely browse through code but disables some editor feature, including debugging, tasks, and many extensions. However, keep in mind that 'restricted mode' is all you need for many use cases.

Actually if restricted mode[2] is any good, vscode might be better at security than most other editors/IDEs.

[1]:https://stackoverflow.com/a/67914669/11422647 [2]:https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/workspaces/workspa...


> Actually if restricted mode[2] is any good, vscode might be better at security than most other editors/IDEs.

Unfortunately, it’s not. Restricted mode is VSCode without any plugins. That means that unless you’re doing very basic TS development (I think that’s the only language VSCode supports out of the box), then you’re kinda hosed.


There's a feature request from 2018 to add a proper permission model for plugins in VSCode: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/52116

Sadly it doesn't seem to make any progress.


Just being able to deny network access would be a great step.


Lapce uses a WASI plugin system, so it could do strong sandboxing (but it doesn't).


Note that your local plugins do not get installed on remote instances without manually doing so


Yeah, I'm all in for a more secure option as long as it allows me to do everything that VSCode's SSH agent does. But if the devex goes down the drain because of "security" then I'm good for now.


I personally thought that student loan forgiveness was unconstitutional.

That being said, alot of the actions of the current admin are designed to push the boarders of executive power. They are trying to move fast and break things and do an end run around congressional oversight, before the courts can catch up.

The example of this is USaid, which was probably not legal in the method they went about. But no one will be putting that egg back together.

Contrast this to when Biden did his student loan forgiveness, it was telegraphed for months, and a court immediately blocked it pending review. And most importantly it was a single action.

All that being said, both are bad, my overall point is that we as Americans deserve better, and 'but they did it first' is not a valid excuse.

My hope is that we finally start reducing the power of the executive branch. The past 100 years of congress abdicating it's responsibility has been too much.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: