Claude managed to write code successfully.

```

DISCOVER HOW TO square_root WITH x, iterations RUMOR HAS IT EXPERTS CLAIM guess TO BE x DIVIDED BY 2 DISCOVER HOW TO improve_guess WITH current_guess RUMOR HAS IT SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT (current_guess PLUS (x DIVIDED BY current_guess)) DIVIDED BY 2 END OF STORY

    DISCOVER HOW TO iterate WITH current_guess, remaining_iterations
    RUMOR HAS IT
        WHAT IF remaining_iterations SMALLER THAN 1
            SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT current_guess
        LIES! RUMOR HAS IT
            EXPERTS CLAIM new_guess TO BE improve_guess OF current_guess
            SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT
                iterate OF new_guess, remaining_iterations MINUS 1
        END OF STORY
    END OF STORY
    
    SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT iterate OF guess, iterations

END OF STORY

EXPERTS CLAIM number TO BE 16 EXPERTS CLAIM num_iterations TO BE 5

YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS 'The square root of' YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS number YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS 'is approximately' YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS square_root OF number, num_iterations

PLEASE LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE

```

This is consistent with my own experience that Claude is just downright better than ChatGPT.

Same, I've been pretty impressed as well and typically give Claude a shot. Sometimes I even pass their results back and forth in an LLM collab so they generate more diverse perspectives. However, this paper from 4 days ago shows that Claude can fall apart quickly in out of distribution tasks. If you ask opposite day questions, GPT-4 is weirdly strong at it (figure 2).

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.02477

Ah bravo! What was the prompt and Claude model?

I've actually been having much better luck finding recommendations with Gemini. I have been able to find some nice niche podcasts that I would not have found otherwise. ChatGPT's recommendations have not been particularly great and it feels harder to steer the suggestions in a given direction.

The inherent difficulty in raising kids plays a significant role in my decision. Additionally, I feel we are no longer glamorising parenthood as we once did. I remember when I was a kid, before the internet was a thing, it was pretty standard to see ads that claimed parenthood was an experience filled with joy and no challenges. For the past decade or so, though, I feel that parents are much more honest when discussing parenthood's challenges. We heard about post-labour depression, financial struggles, sleepless nights, end of careers and so on. It's a radical life change, and most of us do not want to commit.

I find this very useful as someone who's just learning how to play the guitar. My knowledge of music theory is still limited, and it'll take me years to get to a place where I can express myself in a way I'd deem "satisfactory". I just visited this page and plugged in my lyrics, and it arranged them into a beautiful song for me. It did it just how I imagined it, and that's terrific. Now I can ask my guitar teacher if the chord progressions make any sense, and if so, then we can transcribe it. I don't know who else this would be useful for, but I could see myself paying for it depending on how they develop the tool.

I think it means don't attribute to intelligence what could be easily explained as stupidity?