Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | selectodude's commentslogin

VPNs are level 3 while interface bonding is level 2. You’d have to create a vxlan over wireguard. It sounds like a nightmare but it would be interesting to implement.

I'm pretty sure all of these LLMs operate in the black on inference costs.

If I were to set up a DGX200 in my garage, say the 5 year TCO is a million dollars. Split that among 500 people and we can get it done for maybe $30/mo per user in total operating cost. I would bet that these LLMs are far more oversubscribed than 500 subs per server.


> I would bet that these LLMs are far more oversubscribed than 500 subs per server.

Seems like on hn a lot of people pay for the subscriptions.

I don't personally know a single person who pays for any type of llm subscription. I am a staff sw engineer, been doing this a long time.

I acknowledge this is an anecdote. I just happen to know a lot of people at a lot of different companies from my network. Nobody pays for any of this. My company has banned llms, even if I wanted to use one, I can't.

I actually even gave one a shot tonight. I asked for a list of repos I needed to clone to build a yocto image for an nxp board. This was the result:

mkdir -p sources && cd sources

git clone -b $BRANCH git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky

git clone -b $BRANCH git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-freescale

git clone -b $BRANCH github.com

git clone -b $BRANCH github.com

git clone -b $BRANCH git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded

git clone -b $BRANCH github.com

I then pointed out that three of those lines were useless and asked it to fix those lines. The result I got was even more hilarious, and just as useless.

Disclaimer: this was the "dive deeper" button on a google search. No idea what fucking model it tried to use.


I think your skepticism is warranted. Top comments look a lot like ads to me.

How much of the current usage is paying at least 1 cent per inference? AI providers are giving away AI for anyone to use. Only professionals and big companies, that are at most 1% of the market, are paying anything at this point.

Who knows? LLM providers losing money on every user and making it up on volume is a problem for them to deal with. I’m simply saying that the products are here to stay, even if (hopefully) the companies need to right-size their growth strategies. If Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT 5.2 is the pinnacle of models and we never see a new one again, I think they’ll be useful and cash flow positive. OpenAI and Anthropic will, of course, go bankrupt. But the models themselves are absolutely valuable.

I’ve found Wipr 2.0 has been able to block all ads (even YouTube) but it’s unable to hide itself so there are sites that block my ability to read them.

Those people were covered in 1. Outright bad people.

According to the link that you posted, the roads in Germany in 2002 were quite a bit safer than the roads are in the USA in 2025. And they don’t have speed limits. Absolute no brainer to me.

Anyway, not to pile on but you are absolutely incorrect. Forgive the phrasing.


German roads absolutely do have speed limits. Only certain rural sections of the Autobahn don't, but that's not representative of the country as a whole, or even the Autobahn as a whole.

In 2002, significant portions of the Autobahn were unlimited. That's changed in the past 25 years, of course.

They don’t. I’ve gone from rickety and slow excel sheets and maybe some python functions to automate small things that I can figure out to building out entire data pipelines. It’s incredible how much more efficient we’ve gotten.

Definitely thought this was about aviation for a moment.

Yea! I did a double-take, as in addition to Jeppesen, NATS is something I worked with in the past as a UK NOTAM service.

Likewise. It took me a moment to realise Jepsen!== Jeppesen

It's named after Carly Rae Jepsen, of 2012 hit single "Call Me Maybe" fame.

I think Aphyr will insist it isn't actually named after Carly Rae for legal reasons, just a striking coincidence.

And NATS being the North Atlantic tracks.

Frankly it’s rather impressive we have such detailed mapping of it.

The old equipment is mothballed because china is the only buyer and nobody wants to do anything that the Trump admin will at some point decide is tariff-worthy. So it all sits.


Sure it’s fine. It’s also a significant pay cut for almost every American doctor.

Normal specialists in the US out-earn chief physicians in Germany by hundreds of thousands of dollars. All the fringe benefits in the world aren’t gonna buy you a new boat.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: