The level of integration of little electronics (like the LiDAR and the OLED screen) into a print is amazing! I am thinking about an electronic light meter that is coupled to the shutter and saves the current reading to an SD card, so that you could later sync the EXIF data to the scans.
Shameless plug: I have made a website that lists a lot of 3D printable film cameras (including the links to the print files). Feel free to have a look if you are thinking about printing your own camera. Some are really cheap and easy to print.
Cool visualization! I was wondering if you could find sources for war deaths before 1800. I would be interested to see how they compared to the later wars. Also, making the icons and the labels for the categories sticky (so that they are always on the left side) would make it more useful and less cluttered.
Thanks for sharing it!
You might be able to do that with built-in git functionality called gitmailmap. It is basically a file where you can map multiple names and emails to the same one.
Reminds me of the time I applied this technique to basically a webcam stream of the northern night sky. You could immediately see if there were northern lights that night (and when) without having to scrub through the footage. I bet there are other use cases that haven't been explored yet.
Your coffee in a café in Germany is taxed differently based on the amount and type of milk in your coffee. Oh and of course the tax rate is different depending on whether you consume it in the café or take it to go.
Also, there is not 'the one' film look. There is still a lot of different films around and even new ones being released each year. I have made a list of films that are currently reasonable easy to obtain with links to example images:
I think for many people the question is not whether you could recreate the look with a digital camera. Instead you already get the look you chose by selecting your film baked into the image without having to do any post-processing.
I follow the development of elementary for a while now and even contributed a little bit from time to time and this is honestly the first time I heard of this name change. So I think it is an easy mistake to make and would not automatically assume malice here.
Her twitter (which Lunduke links to, and copied tweets from) very prominently features her new name.
I'm not saying it can't be accidental (in which case you do what you do when you've accidentally been rude - apologize, correct your mistake and move on), but it is at least careless.
A few years ago Lunduke kept sharing some views that I would place in the more “reactionary“ spectrum. I’m not sure he ever distanced himself from that.
He did interview Danielle a few years back however.(1) So maybe it simply was a careless mistake.
This handle is in the archive links the article points to, and that's the important part.
Lunduke had this handle on his screen, and either missed it or chose to ignore it on purpose. The former is careless and sloppy, especially if you're trying to do journalism. The latter is very rude, to put it mildly.
Shameless plug: I have made a website that lists a lot of 3D printable film cameras (including the links to the print files). Feel free to have a look if you are thinking about printing your own camera. Some are really cheap and easy to print.
https://printed.analogcamera.space