> “But what about collaboration?” - I use work tools for work. This is for my life.
I've been experimenting with this at work too. I created a separate internal git repo for the team with 4 never ending files:
- in-progress.md
- up-next.md
- for-future.md
- done.md
So far it's been easier to use than trello or any other project management platform.
Personally I use a single emacs org-mode file for my private work which is 30K lines as of today, but I'm not sure how other people's editors (vscode) handle big files like that.
I've gone through this too and came to the same conclusion except for phone.
While on laptop/desktop nothing beats txt (or md or org), it's just so uncomfortable using a text file like that on the phone and relying on dropbox or something.
And I get it, all the note taking apps on the phone have issues: not local first, proprietary, subscriptions, or no encryption, or a thousand features before making sure the full text search works even offline.
Last year I finally sat down and wrote my own PWA out of frustration [1]. There was a SHOW HN too [2]. Yes, shameless plug. There are only a handful of other people using it (and probably never more than that) but I really wrote it for myself and it's been such a relief the past year knowing I always have my notes whenever wherever and works exactly the way I want.
I probably spent <5h fixing a few issues in the past year. As far as I'm concerned, my problem is solved once and for all.
This right here is, something that probably goes over a lot of peoples heads in here. Understandably so as we are on HackerNews people arr most likely IT people and simialar they view the PC as the prime Working environment. And while i personally concur and think the PC is much more productive than a Phone. One of these two devices you always have in your pocket.
Which is why for jotting done some quick note, or some oh remember to do this later when i am back home is just best done on a phone.
That's not just proprietary, it's surveillance capitalism. "Subscribe for early access and monthly progress updates." You should be embarrassed for posting that kind of filth on a thread about asciinema, which is a free-software program that works offline and has strict privacy protections.
Also, codemic.io seems to be oriented toward full-motion video, so aside from the authoritarianism issues, it's not even related.
I think you're misunderstanding what it does. It's not sending your data to the cloud. It just lets you record a session when you press record. Also it's opensource too.
Hmm, maybe I jumped to the wrong conclusion. Is it like a delayed open-source release thing, like "sponsors get access to new releases before the open-source release"? I'm trying to understand how "subscribe for early access" coexists with "it's opensource".
The frontend is in pure HTML and CSS. But we can't build the server with HTML and CSS. These are markup languages. We still need a programming language. Now of course you could pick something with a thinner runtime like C instead of js on node.js, but there's no escaping a runtime.
Frameworks and runtimes though very similar technically, are different conceptually. Frameworks dictate a structure (a framwork) for how code is written (think React components) whereas runtimes are more concerned with letting you run the code and interface with the underlying platform (think libc).
This looks fantastic! I’ve been seeing a growing number of tools trying to bring more interactivity to programming tutorials and for good reason. Screencasts are too passive, and it’s easy to get lost halfway through. Books and blogs don’t really show how code evolves over time either.
I’m working on a solution too, called CodeMic [1] where instead of bringing the environment to the web, it brings video and workspace sync into the IDE so viewers can follow along directly inside their own editor.
You’ve done an impressive job integrating everything, including the Console for example, that’s especially tricky to pull off in an extension for VSCode, Emacs, or Vim.
Interactivity and liveness in programming deserves to be discussed far more often than it is on front-page of hacker news, but excited there are multiple ongoing threads!
I'm a very strong supporter of interactive blogposts as well. Obviously https://ciechanow.ski/ is leader here - being able to mess with something to build intuition is huge.
Agreed. ciechanow.ski has been a huge inspiration, as well as 3blue1brown, Bret Victor, and Chris Granger (remember Light Table?). But none of them provide a way to walk through thousands of lines of real code and show how it is built and evolves over time. That is the key problem Scrimba and CodeMic are trying to solve.
The two people I have seen who really master this are Robert Nystrom (Crafting Interpreters) and Casey Muratori (Handmade Hero). But even they are limited by the mediums they use: books and videos, which are not ideal for this kind of guided exploration.
CodeMic looks very cool, well done! A lot of people have asked us over the years whether we they can implement Scrimba into their preferred IDE, so it makes total sense to take that approach as well.
Think Asciinema, but for full coding sessions with audio, video, and images.
It makes following tutorials and understanding real codebases much more practical than watching a video.
Local first, and open source.
https://CodeMic.io
reply