Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rooodini's commentslogin

Yes, exactly. Here’s what BibleGateway says about it: https://support.biblegateway.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001403...


Shouldn’t the demo quote link to https://sometimesright.com/2020/04/25/blogging-vs-twitter/ ? (instead of the homepage)


You're right! Just fixed it. Good catch.


https://www.opendesk.cc/about/company says:

> Three of the founding team were also co-founders of the WikiHouse open source construction set.


The future has a very low Bus Factor


agreed. Just one example of a unicorn would strengthen the case for this metric.


> The insight is that there Needs To Be A Central, Browsable Repository of What Pages Have this Meta Content.

Are you able to give further examples of projects like Hypothesis failing? I’m not sure I’m quite ready to conclude this _can’t_ work without a centralized interface.

In any case, though, it would probably be straightforward to add a centralised top stories page while keeping comments inline.


Google Sidewiki the biggest I can remember


> Did something happen?

This happened: https://twitter.com/hypothes_is/status/671684236869414914


@giacecco does something similar, but as a freelance data scientist, each of his business cards shows some graphic of a project he has worked on. He asks people to pick a card, then he tells them about the project they chose. Works really well


Now that makes sense and serves to anchor himself in their mind. So now when I find his card days or weeks later, I'm more likely to remember him and what he does. And that's the point. :)


PIRC and WWF produced an interesting report on this topic a few years ago: http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/think_of_me_as_evil.pdf


no longer developed by EllisLab, perhaps.. https://github.com/bcit-ci/CodeIgniter


> […] as dangerous as `curl dangerous.com | sh`.

dangerous.com appears to be a saucy outfits retailer. Irrespective of the name, piping the html to sh is probably fine.


I often wonder about the results of people using functional hostnames in their examples. Most PoC exploit code use "target.com" as a place holder which makes sense, but hilariously is also the hostname for US retailer Target...


This is exactly the reason example.com exists


Yep. RFC2606 It is what they should use. And if you need to specify 2 hosts, you can use example.net and .org as well.

Unfortunately, the example domains don't convey context very well, so we see things like target.com, victim.com, etc


This can be corrected by target.example.com and victim.example.com. Conveys the context while remaining safe as an example.


That generally works, although in some cases it makes a difference whether two hosts are on the same tld; at the very least, it implies a connection between the two that may not always make sense (why is aggressor.example.com attacking victim.example.com?).


The same goes for TEST-NET (192.0.2.0/24), TEST-NET-2 (198.51.100.0/24), TEST-NET-3 (203.0.113.0/24), MCAST-TEST-NET (233.252.0.0/24), and the IPv6 documentation-only prefix (2001:db8::/32).


But of course they could do some fancy user agent check to only give malicious stuff when requested by curl.


heh. check out http://hashbang.sh it's both html and shell script :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: