Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | robotomir's commentslogin

What if the threat is not environmental collapse but hostile government?


If they can reach your submarine, they can reach your space colony.


Surprise Dodgeball reference. But I don't think the ocean is as far away as deep space. I also think due to its proximity, it could be entangled in political paradigms that lead to entanglements in international conflicts and the independence from those political paradigms affords a form of insulation.


Do you think that monitoring and surveillance are less of a problem in the US? In China?


There's still more freedom (like, real, everyday freedom, not just abstract "rights") in US than in EU.


Come on, we don't need to race to the bottom :-)

(Note, I'm not vouching for the comment you replied to - EU is not even close/comparable to what peak USSR was)


Bronze pipes have been discovered in Roman-era settlements and even earlier sites. That's a long time before tobacco was available in Europe.


I’ve never seen that, but I’d love to find it. Do you have a reference? It’s my understanding that there was no smoking in Europe before Columbus. (With the exception of smoking tents, like in Herodotus or the biblical tabernacle)


cannabis and opium are both smokable, and accord to TFA were both present in Central Europe during the ancient times.


>Diátaxis is similar to DITA

I don't see it. DITA differentiates between topic types such as task, reference, concept, etc., but a tutorial or a solution guide will be a combination of those topic types. Here I believe the focus is on deliverables that are larger than the individual topic.


There are less than benign godlike entities in that imagined future, for example the Excession and some of the Sublimed. That adds an additional layer to the narrative.


I am sorry for jumping on this opportunity to be a smartass, but this type of armor predates the sarissa phalanx by almost 1000 years.


Well I stand happily corrected then!


You can deorbit debris without physical contact, but you could argue the method results in a weapon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_broom


Anything that can deorbit debris can be used as an anti-satellite weapon almost by definition.


It would be an incredibly ineffective weapon.

The way a laser broom works is imparting an extremely miniscule bit of momentum every time the object is in line of sight of the laser. Over time you lower its orbit enough for atmospheric drag to take over. For small debris, like baseball sized chunks of insulation, it takes months to deorbit the objects. For something the size of a satellite it would take an order of magnitude longer than the life expectancy of the satellite, and that's assuming it does no station-keeping.

Laser brooms are great because they can deorbit a lot of debris in parallel, which is great if your goal is to slowly clean up an orbit. They are pretty much the worst option for deorbiting a specific object quickly which is a hard requirement for any anti-satellite weapon.


Makes sense but are there actually limits that prevent the scaling? IE instead of a single laser broom I build 50 near a solar/nuclear plant and use the surplus energy. Usually they all deorbit different objects but I could choose to aim them all at the same object.

I don't see much of a limit to scale. Satellites can only dissipate so much heat so you don't even have to deorbit it to be successful, you just need impart enough energy to overheat the satellite or disable key parts.


A single broom for debris clearing is an immense project - likely $500 million to $1 billion to construct. It is basically a big observatory telescope with a gigantic high power laser - it is large, fragile, and completely immobile. That's for slowly cleaning up an orbit, to scale up to a weapons system you'd need a system equivalent to building tens of thousands of them.

You're not building a weapon system with surplus energy. Energy costs are actually pretty negligible - with 0.01% electric to kinetic efficiency it's only about 7 million dollars worth to bring down a 1000 kg satellite. The issue is the equipment. To deorbit that satellite in a year, you would need to on average be pumping 7.8 gigawatts of electricity into the system. If you put literally all of the US's electricity production into it, you could deorbit that single satellite in 2.4 days. And note that is if you could constantly keep the satellite in field of view, realistically only a small percentage of a satellite's orbit will be even under the best of circumstances, and many orbits won't be in view at all.

Yeah, there's nothing physically stopping someone from building such a system, but you're talking about putting basically all of a large nation state's GDP for decades into one weapon system that, in the best case scenario, is going to do an extremely minute amount of damage and realistically would be destroyed long before it could accomplish anything.

Disabling a satellite poses different technical challenges. For momentum transfer, so long as you're hitting the object you're good, to target critical systems would require far greater precision, and dumping heat faster than the satellite can dissipate it would require even higher instantaneous power. Remember the satellite is only very briefly in view. While this is almost certainly more feasible than a weapon that works by deorbiting, it is still very difficult. Laser weapons for disabling and destroying aircraft and airborne munitions, which is an inherently easier task, is an active field of research that many billions of dollars have been dumped into over the years, with no system yet being demonstrated as effective. Satellites are just faster moving, more distant targets for such systems.

ASAT missiles might be too mundane for the megalomaniac Bond villain, but they are an immensely more practical solution to the problem.


At least talking about it will start the slow expansion of the Overton Window


In-space contactless theories also exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion-beam_shepherd


There is a non-zero chance we are headed for a situation where global warming and sea level rise will make hundreds of millions, mostly from equatorial regions, desperate refugees. It could be that an attitude of self-righteousness might become impossible to maintain. Friends come and go.


So, you propose to do what? Let those people drown? Or actively shooting them? Or maybe proactively let the starve? Either way, it would be genocide.


Yes, we might need to shoot at them.


What is it with you people just casually argueing for genocide? Do you think this is, I don't know, tough or edgy?


Do you propose doing nothing about the people firing rockets at shipping? What about the lives of the sailors on those ships?

Is there some intrinsic right that the rocket-firers are defending that warrants treating them as other than aggressors in this situation?

Why do you call it genocide? Surely if you shoot at ships in international waters, and it is not defence, then you're bringing whatever acts of defence follow on your own head. Acts of defence seem impossible to class as genocide (but I'd like to hear arguments to the contrary if you have them).


OP talked about the millions of potential refugees from climate change we might have. Not the Hoithi rebels firing at international shipping as retaliation of what happens im Gaza.

Regaeding the latter, yes, for bow I think doing nothing militarily is exactly what is needed.


I think you missed who the "them" was in this later part of the thread: not Yemenis attacking civilian shipping, but rather hypothetical future climate refugees from islands that disappear due to sea level rise.


Not only that, people whose most fertile agricultural land is now under salt water.


You set up a straw man. An insincere response to an insincere question.


HN has always had a core of fascist affinity but it's quickly becoming more open, unfortunately.


What are examples of good CMS software that you've used?


ProcessWire CMS. Developer oriented but amazing for clients once set up. Been using it for 10 years straight.


I can't remember the last project where I haven't used Craft CMS. Twig templating, no opinion on the data structure and easy to extend.


My thought as well. Craft is (inexpensively) commercial but it essentially starts where you’re fighting to get with Drupal for medium-sized projects. And authors like it.

As a CMS with web framework features, it’s also built on top of a model/controller-based framework, using Yii instead of Symfony. Craft has thinned their abstractions over time to more directly match Yii’s methods.


I would not put him in the same league as Lem. Or Banks or Reynolds, for that matter.


I would rate Lem higher than those, but not sure if it's a different league.


It's not even the same sport.


I would


Tchaikovsky is uneven, as are Banks and Reynolds. Lem is just different. He’s rarely a hard sci-fi writer and some of his books are barely sci-fi. More like Voltaire (Invincible is sci-fi)


In fact quite a lot of Lem's writing is not sci-fi at all, period. Hospital of Transfiguration is an absolutely mandatory read for any fan of Lem, even though it will leave you depressed for a week afterwards. And memoirs found in a bathtub is just a masterpiece of absurdity, it has a very good English audiobook actually if anyone wants to try.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: