Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rewq4321's commentslogin

Not just the API - I'm now suddenly having DNS troubles with one of my domains. I think maybe only domains/sites that use their "configuration rules", or some specific feature like that.


Happened to me yesterday


> Also the attention mechanism is baked in during pretraining

IIUC, this is no longer necessarily true with positional encodings like ALiBi: https://github.com/ofirpress/attention_with_linear_biases


What source is that understanding based on? I was not under the impression that Anthropic was intending to open source their models at all.


Yep, unions are fighting against even allow moving to 1 crew member per train, let alone zero.

https://smart-union.org/our-priorities/legislative-issues/

https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-15540.pdf


Are you sure you're up to date on the latest additions to this API? This wasn't in the MVP:

> The origin private file system provides optional access to a special kind of file that is highly optimized for performance, for example, by offering in-place and exclusive write access to a file's content.

https://web.dev/file-system-access/#accessing-files-optimize...

It was originally going to be a separate high-perf "Storage Foundation" API, but that was merged with the File System Access API.


Huh. Disregard what I wrote entirely, then. Reading through https://github.com/WICG/file-system-access/blob/main/AccessH..., I can see how they’ve bypassed most or all of the problems I saw—I was making unnecessary assumptions.

Thank you for correcting me. I am now enthusiastic about OPFS.


This has to be ruled out first: https://github.com/whatwg/fs/issues/7#issuecomment-116176851...

...but then the OPFS will be a quite decent fit. We (DuckDB-Wasm) are also looking closely at OPFS.

IMHO the requirement here is not even to get to full ACID.

With OPFS, we will get close enough to IndexedDB on steroids and bypassing the js heap limits through out-of-core operators.

After all, we are still running in a browser.

So I see the value of Wasm-based databases to be a front-facing accelerator, not a substitute for robust storage solutions.


Great to see this kind of pleasant discourse on HN!


The root cause is primarily housing policy. Let developers build many apartments, and let them build small apartments. Zoning laws that make it a years-long process to just get a permit, or that force developers to build apartments with minimum square footage, or prevent large families living in a "small" apartment - these are all luxury laws forced upon poor people so that rich people can be more comfortable.

I count myself as progressive but am almost disgusted by how many progressives try to muddy the water here because they don't like to face the fact that they have to give something up to make their neighbourhood more accessible to those who are well-off people.

Anyone who doesn't take housing policy seriously on the issue of homelessness is either naive, or doesn't actually care about the issue and instead is trying to use it to push some other agenda.


*make their neighbourhood more accessible to those who are not well-off


Fun fact: It's also far more environmentally friendly in terms of how much land is required to produce it: https://ourworldindata.org/palm-oil


Not the person you're replying to, but if you're willing to do that to your walls, you're probably willing to pay for an external antenna and internal transmitter


> there is value in publicizing the fact [...] This has consequences in how they approach treatment (medication-centric)

If anything (in my experience) people are too biased against medicine. And as others pointed out, this isn't at all evidence that medicines don't work - their efficacy is based on double-blind studies, not on chemical imbalance hypotheses.

There are many other possible mechanisms that aren't related to the environment. Publicizing studies like this beyond academia is only likely to cause confusion and unfounded anti-medicine sentiment.


As of quite recently that may be changing in Chromium (early experiment): https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9xWJK...

IIUC, the TLDR is that they're experimenting with loading a bunch of popular scripts (e.g. top `N` scripts from CDNs) on all browsers, so the response is immediate, but they can't use the timing for fingerprinting because it's immediate for everyone.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: