Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rcMgD2BwE72F's commentslogin

That US administration wishes you would unsubscribe too.

Yeah, I'd love to cancel my subscription to the administration too.

I'm glad it's GDPR for me.

If said once, yes.


Love this too (customer for 5+ years, I can't believe people who can afford Fastmail don't migrate from Gmail).

I just wish they were more privacy-friendly.


What about charging at work?


Yes, there are chargers there as well, i guess around 40 in the parking garage.


No. It's really easy to install charging points on office parking space and supermarket. You don't need to plug at home when half of the day the car is parked at places with chargers.


Comments like this are bubble coded. Plenty of people don't park at an office, don't park at a supermarket, certainly not for half the day


Not half a day, but BEVs are impractical today if you don’t have home charging, but throw in restaurants, movie theaters, doctor’s and dentist’s offices, and L2 charging starts to become a practical alternative for many.


How many miles of long trips? A quick search gives me half of them are long distance (50+ miles).

Since the short trips can all be done very efficiently on battery (recovering all the braking, too), I guess the weight isn't much of an issue for commuting if you can have the rest -half of the total driven miles- on EV with a full battery vehicle.

I wish I could find numbers on eCO2/miles for the short vs long trips.


Have you reported this to a consumer protection agency? What did they say?



I use my elbow. It is the same recommendation as to cough to your elbow. You do not touch with your elbow on yourself or others so it is generally safe.


Unfortunately not always practical due to poorly designed handles and lock mechanisms. I usually "sacrifice" my little finger for this when I have to use my hands, with the theory that I'm much less likely to put that finger in my mouth or eye etc.


My "Plan B" is the paper towel I dried my hands with. Though bathroom layout, missing trash cans, and lack of paper towels occasionally foil that.


in iffy situations I use my fathers method, which is the systematic prevention of transfer, even if you must touch things or people (doctor,pathologist,forensics) in less than ideal circumstances, hard to describe, easy to demonstrate.


Alternatively, the back of your knee:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkLfAG0AAzQ

Though this is more for the coughing/sneezing rather than the door opening.


No. I'm on GrapheneOS and not tied to Google.

You must be thinking of the Google Play Services but these aren't required by GrapheneOS.


No, we're thinking about the fact that Android is Google owned and developed and no removal of Play Services changes that.

Every Android ROM is critically dependant on Googles work to actually develop and secure the OS.


It is tied to google inasmuch all target phones are google branded. https://grapheneos.org/faq#supported-devices

Hopefully that can change, in the future


It's tied to Google's development strategy, such as removal of Manifest-V2, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41905368


It could change now, it could have changed years ago, they just have no interest in trying. It's pretty annoying honestly.


As long as it depends on Google paying upstream development that GrapheneOS updates from, it is tied to Google.

Now if GrapheneOS was its own thing without additional AOSP code updates.


This becomes sophistry, though. "tied to" in a way that doesn't matter, doesn't matter.


Ah but it does, as Google can decide to close down AOSP shop at any moment.


If that happens, the world can always try to fork. Until then it seems kind of pointless to do so?


Try is the keyword here.

Hence why these efforts should not rely on US institutions good will in first place.


Can try to fork?, china , russia, and lots of smaller countrys are steadily moving away and as basic introperability standards for phone and internet will remain, they can do this, and pressure is also mounting to get a linux phone fully functional, that will alao happen. And in a world where Guggappl is providing genocide and abduction services, Billions would happily choose other alternatives.


China and Russia are likewise involved in their own genocides (Uyghurs and Ukraine respectively), and they are just as interested in developing centralised systems of control. They will not give the world truly free and open platform.


"They will not give the world truly free and open platform", uhuhu!, but we are giving them the pivot point to claim the flag of freedom , rather than just doing that ourselves. also, one more move from you know who, and a whole lot of countrys will have to very seriously start looking for stable deals that last longer than it takes the ink to dry. China just ghosted nvidia, on the "something 200" ai chip to start shipping in march, tsmc and all there suppliers have stood down on that, and will of course, instantly re focus on the next job, which might be a batch of chips for fairphones....


> but we are giving them the pivot point to claim the flag of freedom

Nobody said that, so you're arguing with the strawman.

The OS offering actual freedom is GNU/Linux.


The day they do that, Android will just be a Chinese product and Google will lose control over it.


Huawei took control of its own destiny instead of relying on Google forks.

https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/design/

https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/harmonyos/develop/


And I am still sad that they didn't go for an open source hard fork of AOSP. Would have been fun.


Indeed and if Google would pull the plug on AOSP, some initiative like this would become the de facto Android standard.


I love your optimism. What you'll see is return to 2000s where you may have had "Symbian" as the operating system, but the phones weren't compatible between themselves and apps broke and didn't work across manufacturers (or even product lines) because there was noone enforcing compatibility.

I wonder if you forgot that or you're too young to remember what kind of bizarre hell mobile development was at that time.

Heck, even early Android was really hard to develop for because CTS suite didn't cover enough and all of us spent hours upon hours (and many dollars) trying to reproduce and fix Samsung, Huawei, HTC and other bugs.


I never said it's going to be smoother than it is right now, just that Google will lose control.

8 of the top 10 manufacturers are Chinese, the last two are Samsung (which definitely isn't going to side with Google) ... and Google themselves.

If Google doesn't publish AOSP anymore, Pixels will be the only phone with their software on it, Samsung might attempt something alone and the rest will pick up the development from a Chinese government consortium which will be the de-facto default mobile platform instead of the Google one.


I doubt that people advocating for GrapheneOS would pivot to a Chinese powered platform.


They would have to follow like everybody else, they aren't powerful enough to dictate market trends.

8 out of the top 10 Android manufacturers are Chinese.

Google would just lose the ownership of Android to a Chinese consortium used by everybody else.


Anyone on Graphene is tied tot Google, for it requires Google hardware.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: