> Per-article pricing would expose that 90% of online journalism is commodity rewrites of AP wire stories.

And recommendations for products they've never tried, with affiliate links.

I think Fluxer just became a more likely candidate. Its maintainer just committed to removing its CLA[1] once the rewrite's done.

It also has screen sharing[2], which Stoat doesn't have yet[3], though it doesn't support casting audio yet. Also, the mobile app implementation can't arrive soon enough!

[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/FluxerApp/comments/1r8724q/comment/... [2]: https://www.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/comments/1r6muvz/comment/... [3]: https://old.reddit.com/r/stoatchat/comments/1r7tdg4/answerin...

Exactly. If you have the decency to ask, you probably have the capacity to be courteous beyond the minimum required by law.

I'm more interested in the general question rather than the specifics of this situation, which I'm sure is now incredibly common. I know it looked at those implementations because I asked it to, and therefore I will credit those projects when I release this library. In general though, people do not know what other material the agents looked at in order to derive their results, therefore they can't give credit, or even be sure that they are technically complying with the relevant licenses.

I think that’s called “consulting”.

Pretty sure high fines would greatly incentivize increased enforcement.

Why? The police officer gets paid the same either way. And that's probably in line with how we want it, lest police officers start seeing infractions that don't exist when their daughter's next birthday comes near.

The officer, sure. But departmental policy?

That can help, but policy doesn't execute itself, it's executed through the police officers. Most cities aren't prepared to be able to follow-through to the logical conclusion the steps they'd need to take if their police force is fully intransigent with regard to following policy, so the policy itself is set based in part on what the force itself is willing to enforce.

Either I'm confused or maybe you didn't understand my point - why wouldn't the department want to execute a policy that benefits them greatly through increased revenue? If it's not profitable or desirable to do so, increase the fines.

I bet you could do the same thing with pandoc and skip serializing to HTML entirely.

Apparently yes: https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#options

Thanks for chiming in to provide some clarity, Dan. Any comments on this?

> it will be manually boosted in the algorithm by them.

The intentions are of course good, but a little transparency around these manual boosts would be appreciated.

They're just talking about the second-chance pool (SCP): see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308.

I don't think that's a full-stack framework?

Lustre (hi, author here) has isomorphic components so you can render components both on the client or as realtime LiveView-esque things on the server, which I think is what the commenter was alluding to.

Definitely not a full-stack framework though: firmly a frontend thing just it blurs what "frontend" means a little! Hologram has a wider scope here being built on top of Phoenix.

What city are you in? Or state / general region, if you'd rather not share.

marin county

Epilepsy warning please! :-)