Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | postalrat's commentslogin

It's clearly meant as a punishment because they could easily give recommendations based on playlists and such.

lol yeah at first I was annoyed that they seem to be applying pressure on people without the history feature cause they certainly kept recommending videos to me even though I had that feature off. But a few weeks ago, the screens are all blank imploring me to turn on the history, but I actually quite like it. No more youtube doom scrolling on my phone.


That's your answer? "Next time"?

What X and why did the prosecutors raid their own office?

Some people are calling Twitter "X".

The second part of your question remains a mystery :-)


If you are taking out the sugar you might as well go all the way and take out the milk.


Full fat milk is probably better because a) it will taste better and b) the fat will slow the energy release.


That's what I do, my son often comments that I eat gruel for breakfast.

What a lot of people don't realise is that the creamy texture comes from the oats rather than the milk.


It’s so funny you’re being downvoted, i think it’s just an expression of how much people hate oatmeal and like milk, lol. And also you can pry my milk from my cold dead hands.


Except nobody uses it that way. Auctions are rare themselves. Sellers dont like it, buyers dont like it yet ebay won't change it.


People will pay a premium to win, not everyone but enough to make it worth it.


And silver is $95 per ounce.


I know. Bring back silver currency!


It has at least one fatal flaw: the math it is based on. I feel like it won't be too long before a few major weaknesses are found and bitcoin will lose all security.


Bitcoin has been running since 2009 with plenty of incentive for hackers to find flaws in it and they haven't found any. It uses standard cryptography that is used by all our computer systems. If a flaw exists it's not just bitcoin that will be damaged but everything we use.


They are busy making other stuff. Its OK if you don't appreciate their work.


No human reads a novel and evaluates it as a whole. It's a story and the readers perception changes over the course of reading the book. Current AI can certainly do that.


> It's a story and the readers perception changes over the course of reading the book.

You're referring to casual reading, but writers and people who have an interest and motivation to read deeply review, analyze, and summarize books under lenses and reflect on them; for technique as much as themes, messages, how well they capture a milieu, etc. So that's quite a bit more than "no human"!


AI can make sense of the page with CSS, JS, etc and transform the page for the preferences of the user. A true user agent.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: