Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pompidoo's commentslogin

I developed a device that turns an Airtag on and off at specific intervals (roughly 80% off 20% on). While the AirTag is off, it can’t be detected, and when it turns on again, you can locate it and with it your stolen item: https://undetectag.com I'm about to order the new version to check whether it works on it too


Given how tracking stolen items is technically identical to tracking a person, wouldn't this also be a device for undetectable stalking?


You already know the answer to your question


You may want to update the marketing copy until you've tested it: "The device is guaranteed to work with the current version of the AirTag."


This is brilliant just like Elevation Lab's 10 year battery for the AirTag. Do you think they'll work together?


Combining Pareto and Murphy might result in 4 hours head start for the thief though.


I felt like adding that disclaimer was a nice thing to do, informing the customer and letting them make their own decision. It makes almost no difference to remove that disclaimer (well, it would increase sales). it is not to protect myself. The price is very low and margin is very thin, what happens if Apple bricks the device? There would be very little money left to refund the customers, and most of the refunds would be eaten by transaction fees. Is it worth it for the customers to receive a few cents back? And that's assuming I keep all the money in the company and don't pay myself.


Agree that the transparency is nice but the limitation it mentions disqualifies the product for me.


Yes I think having 2 is a good strategy. I'm also considering offering different timings in the future.


I understand your point. In this case the price point makes this a bearable risk, especially to protect much more valuable items. A refund is only useful if only a certain % of people have issue or the company is big. Since this is my only product, an Airtag update that bricks the devices would just bankrupt the company and make me unable to refund most people as my margin is very low anyway.


I was thinking that the price must be high if folks are worried about it not working and getting a refund.

For 10EUR, not only would I not worry about a refund but now I’m buying one or two to use myself on my bicycle and car.


sure but you've acknowledged that your product is something that Apple considers bad and could shut it down. that can usually be overlooked for things like emulation, but you've developed a product that does something Apple specifically added protections against after they learned of its dangerous misuse


> sure but you've acknowledged that your product is something that Apple considers bad

No. Everyone that builds projects inside someone else's ecosystem is subject to this. Even companies that like what your are doing might break it if they aren't specifically testing against your product.


That does not read as "something that Apple considers bad" but rather "something that Apple COULD consider bad"


hardcoded, but I'm thinking of offering different time intervals in the future


> offering different time intervals

your previous response to the stalking concerns was "it's 4 hours off / 1 hour on, the device is not very suitable for stalking someone"; wouldn't this comment - allowing that to change - then make it even easier for stalkers?


Well it would warn the person that they are being tracked when the airtag turns back on, so I feel like any other tracker would be better suited for stalking people, and most of the time it wouldn't even track.


The Airtag is mostly off and when back on will alert the person.


Yes, unfortunately it would.


As it's 4 hours off / 1 hour on, the device is not very suitable for stalking someone. Also once the AirTag is back on and the person starts moving, they will be alerted that the AirTag is tracking them.


That’s perfect for finding out where someone lives. Drop it in their bag or jacket at a concert/bar/work/whatever-in-the-evening, and the place they’re likely at in 4 hours is their home.

Not trying to be creepy, I’m just trying to demonstrate how we all need to think like adversaries (eg creeps) when designing products.


You can probably find out where they live from knowing their name. This application is not a high level of stalking.


The concert/bar example allows stalking without knowing someone’s name.


> not a high level of stalking

imo no level of stalking is appropriate. while this device might not do everything a stalker wants it to, it surely makes it easier for them


That's not true in all scenarios.

I once donated an infant car seat to a coworker but forgot I had put an AirTag on it. After she had taken it home, her iPhone told there was an unknown AirTag and she texted me. I apologized profusely and she wasn't bothered by it. Nonetheless had I been nefarious, I would have been able to get her home address.


Good catch! Thank you I will correct it now.


https://undetectag.com I developed a device that turns an Airtag on and off at specific intervals. Current Airtags are detectable right away and cannot be used to track stolen property. That device allows you to hide an Airtag in your car, for example, and someone that steals your car will not be able to use some app to detect it. The Airtag will also not warn the thief of its presence. After some hours, the Airtag turns on again and you can find out its location. It’s not foolproof, as the timing has to be right, but still useful.


An idea for more complete coverage: have 2 of them, and invert their intervals, such that one and only one is always on


This will work for a while, before thieves know to check for multiple airtags. Better to not detect any in the first place


Yes it's also a good strategy.


Is 4 on 1 off really the best strategy? Seems like it just makes it a 20% chance that the thieves detect the AirTag, right?


Yes, I'm thinking of offering various set-ups in the future, if I see that people are interested


Make it timing based and randomized. Sync the 'seed' during device init, and then the listener knows when to listen for the airtag. The airtag then turns on for a specified duration (random between some min/max time), and the listener picks it up.

Bonus points if the 'seed' is volatile.


Airtags are detectable to prevent abuse, how do you want to prevent abuse with your product?


Due to its timing, the device is not suitable for stalking someone. Additionally, if you place it in someone's handbag, for instance, once the AirTag comes back online and the person starts moving, they will be alerted that the AirTag is tracking them.


Have you considered adding an IMU/motion sensor?


Interesting idea... I think it would increase the price a bit too much


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: