I don't get the sarcasm here.. Instead of sniping with snark (see HN rules, please) post your better take.

Is it not literally true that he is calling for action from the populace without doing it? You all can only lift a finger to downvote a literal call to action lmao

I don't think that's all we (assuming you're USA) had to do or need to do going forward. Voting is "necessary but not sufficient" as the quote goes.

> Being anti-immigration is not racist

it de facto is even if you claim otherwise or hide behind "but economics"

we do not need to give anyone in this administration benefit of doubt.

> it de facto is

So, when Bernie in 2016 said that illegal immigration is bad thing he was racist?

> my impression is

not sure why you'd give them any benefit of the doubt. they haven't earned it.

> Hershey acknowledges some recipe changes but said Wednesday that it was trying to meet consumer demand for innovation

my bad. i expected consumers to demand deliciousness.

I presumed Hershey was a valuable brand name. If they can't distinguish "chocolate" from "chocolatey", why would they even risk the Hershey or Reece's brand names? Why not release it as generic? Otherwise, we're left with Occam's Razor.

tree=unique landmark. cornfield=large uniform area without unique landmarks.

That he said it or that the label “problematic” is correct?

Both of the above, and also that the label “addiction” is typically not correct.

I think a major part is about what’s happening in Cuba. Venezuela used to supply Cuba with cheap oil. That’s stopped and Trump has threatened any countries who send oil with tariffs (of course!).

Rubio’s personal quest is to take down the Cuban gov’t and I guess eventually help Cuban capitalists get reparations including his family.

Yup. I came in to ask that same question. Lot of money potentially “left on the table”.

I wonder how much of this tech is being sold to or planned to be sold to the military.