Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mozboz's commentslogin

OT, but anyone have similar stack traces that show call stacks or abstractions in other layers, down to transistors, up to user?


TL;DR: 'I was surprised to learn how online advertising works, my manager in a big corp made me sad.'


independent of the facts, shall we not start doxing individuals here? this isn't 4chan.


Does finding a public linkedin profile count as doxing? I don't know much about the topic, but I was under the impression that there was more to it than that. it was a black-hat hacker thing, that it involved getting past some kind of access control.


This definitely isn't doxing.

Doxing is when you find very personal information, such as place of residence. In can involve information about the workspace, Linked-in profile or so forth - but only in the case that the victim is operating under a pseudonym and have not disclosed their true identity themselves.


This isn't doxxing. Doxxing would be if we posted her address, po box, mailing address, etc.

What we are doing here is calling someone out on their bullshit in a public profile.


Why are you down-voting this person? They are not trolling. They're only advising a little restraint.

Honestly, calling this doxing is pretty accurate. Before that user posted her LinkedIn profile, she was an anonymous figure in this dispute which, frankly, was all that was relevant to HN. Now, through LinkedIn, she will potentially receive hate mail and, with an identifying image, is more likely to be pinpointed on other platforms which may reveal more personal information about her.

People should remember that there is a lot about this situation that they don't know. This man who was fired from Amazon may have a legitimate grievance and he may not. Things might look one way when described on paper, but could have seemed quite different in real life. We could be (and probably are) missing out on a lot of important details that only eye-witnesses could be aware of.


> Before that user posted her LinkedIn profile, she was an anonymous figure in this dispute which, frankly, was all that was relevant to HN.

How was she anonymous when she was named in the article? Her LinkedIn profile is literally the first thing that comes up if you google her.


Clicked expecting relationship advice. Stayed to learn about basketball.


Yes.

People (including me) are thinking about and working on personally owned and hosted data. Your forum posts live in _your_ cloud, and in a way that the features as brickcap describes are achievable.

See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8049890


Can you provide a reference to, or a better description of the 'ideas coming out of UK local government' please?


Hard to remember - some devs / architects I met at LGA conference are trying to reduce their internal app footprints and move to a database is not the cow nor yours model.


Perhaps I don't have enough karma to message directly, but can't see a way to send messages inside HN. Can you provide a way to contact you?



At time of writing 2/7ths of respondents own > 0 bitcoin. Are there many other new technologies you'd expect 2/7ths of all respondents to use/own? Especially one that doesn't really have a direct use to most consumers yet and high risk for people investing.

2/7th's is huge.


It's absolutely huge. If 2/7 of the world population owned bitcoins, there would be at most 0.01 BTC per person.


From HN I'd expect more than that. Don't confuse HN-ers with "general population".


This reply applies equally well to your original comment.


Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     RMS@MIT-MC.ARPA
:(


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: