In some cases (at least here in Argentina) the staff checks that the health insurance cover (partially) the cost of the visit and that the patient has all the correct forms and whatever is necessary. Also, open the door, so the doctor can start with the next patient immediately.
I am pretty sure AI can, at this point in time, not take any blood tests, hold a complex feedback loop with a busy doctor, nor do I want to put any blind trust into its health suggestions.
But that's me and as OP said, not everyone has the luxury of a working medical field.
for example you go to an event and turn it on and thus make urself "matchable" so it would simply make rejection disapear
the difference between this and the pear ring is the simplicity of an app that you can download and start using instead of purchasing an extra item that you have to wear
The problem with an on/off switch is that you have to open the app to change the setting, which means that most people will have it off most of the time. I don't necessarily think the Pear Ring is a better idea than yours; I only raised it to show that other people have tried these low-tech ways to improve dating and have also failed.
If you think about how meeting new people currently works, there's a bit of sizing people up to decide what sort of chances you have or whether they're a creep before you decide whether to go and talk to them - I think that's the crucial aspect your idea is missing.
i thought this is mitigated by setting preferences? I feel like a lot of people get creeped out by mismatches rather real creepy people. So I thought having set some preferences like what the other should like/interests background and so on should prevent meeting creeps
Shared likes and interests are very poor indicators of whether or not the other person is a creep. They're not even very good indicators of whether or not the other person is a good match, to be honest, but at least there's a bit of correlation there.
Isn't that worse than the rejection part in the long term? As uncomfortable as being rejected is, there's value in it.
First, we're all going to be rejected from various things over the course of our lives. It's inevitable. Learning how to deal with it when it happens is a critically important life skill.
Second, isn't it better to know that you've been rejected than to be silently ignored? Being ignored without knowing why is a path to alienation.
Also, this approach doesn't eliminate rejection. At some point, presumably, you're going to meet the person for real. At that point, rejection remains a real possibility.
I find o4 very bad at coding. I tried to improve a script created by 3.5 mini-high with o4 mini-high and it doesn't return nearly as good results as what i used to get by o3.5
"Memoiri" looks like a random misspelling of "Memoir", and that's why I failed to find your app on Google the first time I tried.
Both on Google and Bing, a search for "Memoiri" leads to you, but the first page of results for "diary app" doesn't: you seem to need better promotion much more than a better name.
I have wasted a lot of time building a two sided marketplace for gigs, that was the biggest thing i regret, that i kept trying for much too long of a time
Sounds like he regrets spending so much time working on something that didn't result in anything useful. That's been most of my career, so I empathize.
