Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mockingloris's commentslogin

This is math, beauty, art, creativity, ... unique. My mind is all over the place. Still wrapping my head around it but, I'd really like to see where this leads.

..and time.


TLDR: Psychological Egoism

Think of egoism like a single-threaded algorithm assuming all actions optimize for self. Altruism suggests a multi-threaded model where some processes prioritize others’ well-being. Data from user behavior (empathy-driven actions) and system design (evolutionary efficiency) supports a hybrid model—humans aren’t just “selfish” codebases.

Debated since Hobbes, it’s challenged by:

  - Butler’s Stone: Pleasure is a byproduct, not the goal.
  - Science: Biology (altruism aids survival), neuroscience (motivation ≠ pleasure), and psychology (empathy drives genuine care) suggest mixed motives.
  - Analogy: Egoism is a single-threaded “selfish” algorithm; altruism adds threads for others’ benefit. Data leans toward a hybrid model.
Whenever I dive into a creative project, whether it’s freelancing for a client or tinkering on my own stuff, I know exactly what’s coming. The dopamine hit from shipping code is unreal, like a high from solving a puzzle that’s been nagging me for days. The rep boost, the financial payoff (or potential for my own projects).

But deep down, it’s not just about me. Crafting something that users love or that makes their lives easier? That’s the real magic. It’s a mix of selfish thrill and selfless impact, like a perfectly balanced commit.


Level 5: Rotation was very satisfying.


@jayspiel

> As A designer I was trying to skate to where the puck was going technically.

Resonates big time! At the end of the day, this isn't a full-proof science - it's an art. Req-con-fin(Requires continuous finessing).

I also assume, the project revolved around many roles and as you mentioned, the project was iteratively built around user feedback.

NLM disrupted the space and I know just like with the early days of bard/gemini this will only get insanely better; UI/UX especially.

Dey Well


I use a linux distro as my driver; I'm a linux bro and also phone's still awaiting repairs). I opened my Firefox Developer Edition and tried opening Youtube and found I had been logged out. Tried gmail, same thing - My other gmail accounts too. Gmail redirected me to url[0] to re-authenticate.

Anybody else?

[0] https://workspace.google.com/gmail/


> Also, could you consider making each fourth (or first) column a very slightly lighter grey

This could be a component logic; a row of drop downs for customizing the UI and a good examples are color and grid count. This could even be a toml/json config file that can be imported/exported.

My own addition is ability to import samples from my own device.


Importing samples is on my TODO list. Thank you for the feedback!


> From the official SQLite Database File Format page.

The maximum size database would be 4294967294 pages at 65536 bytes per page or 281,474,976,579,584 bytes (about 281 terabytes).

Usually SQLite will hit the maximum file size limit of the underlying filesystem or disk hardware long before it hits its own internal size limit.


The kioxia lc9 is sold with capacities up to 245TB, so we are like 1 year max away from having a single disk with more than 281TB


"Usually"? I'm not saying there are literally no computers in existence that might have this much space on a single filesystem, but...has there ever been a known case of someone hitting this limit with a single SQLite file?


That's just 10 30TB HDDs. Throw in two more for redundancy and mount them in a single zfs raidz2 (a fancy RAID6). At about $600 per drive that's just $7200. Half that if you go with 28TB refurbished drives (throw in another drive to make up for lost capacity). That is in the realm of lots of people's hobby projects (mostly people who end up on /r/datahoarder). If you aren't into home-built NAS hardware you can even do this with stock Synology or QNAP devices

The limit is more about how much data you want to keep in sqlite before switching to a "proper" DBMS.

Also the limit above is for someone with the foresight that their database will be huge. In practice most sqlite files use the default page size of 4096, or 1024 if you created the file before the 2016 version. That limits your file to 17.6TB or 4.4TB respectively.


Last week I threw together a 840TB system to do a data migration. $1500 used 36-bay 4U, 36 refurbished Exos X28 drives, 3x12 RAIDz2. $15000 all in.


Where did you source the drives?


Never underestimate the ability of an organization to throw money at hardware and use things _far_ past their engineered scale as long as the performance is still good enough to not make critical infrastructure changes that, while necessary, might take real engineering.

Though to be fair to those organizations. It's amazing the performance someone can get out of a quarter million dollars of off the shelf server gear. Just imagine how much RAM and enterprise grade flash that can get someone off of AMD or Intel's highest bin CPU even at that budget!


Poking around for only a minute, the largest SQLite file I could find is 600GB https://www.reddit.com/r/learnpython/comments/1j8wt4l/workin...

The largest filesystems I could find are ~1EB and 700PB at Oak Ridge.

FWIW, I took the ‘usually’ to mean usually the theoretical file size limit on a machine is smaller than theoretical SQLite limit. It doesn’t necessarily imply that anyone’s hit the limit.


Wondered the same thing. That's a lot of data for just one file!

Did a full-day deep dive into SQLite a while back; funny how one tiny database runs the whole world—phones, AI, your fridge, your face... and like, five people keep it alive.

Blows my mind.


> I'm not saying there are literally no computers in existence that might have this much space on a single filesystem

I don't use it for sqlite, but having multi-petabyte filesystems, in 2025, is not rare.


With block level compression you might manage it. But you'd have to be trying for it specifically.


Seen bigger files on HPC systems. Granted, these were not generated intentionally. But still, they were.


Kudos to you and the journey. I appreciate your honesty honestly about giving up on open source alternative for a quite cheap alternative for something you get to keep as your own is not a bad tradeoff.

Your story resonates. I am a self-taught creative and I get stubborn at times about wanting to use/bend a specific technology/tool to achieve a task; maybe it's a sunk cost fallacy OCD thing.

Your site design has character.

PS: Bookmarked your site with the tags - fonts, developer-blog, creative-sites, boutique-designs... on my firefox browser.


> They say that you remember more when handwriting than when typing

I believe that too.

Writing is one of my tools for taming my ADHD tendencies. I have journals of different sizes and when I am in the zone, I capture the moment in my own words and in my own way. I draw lines and art on my notes and just scanning a few lines on another day instantly immerses me back in the moment when the ideas/words/thought hit me.

For those who type better than they write, I don't see any reason to not do that, even though for me, it's pen on paper.

We're all different and I am a strong believer of the idiom that goes "One man's food..."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: