Maybe not on the investment/new hotness side, but as a user I'm not clamoring for greater LLM integration. Maybe I'm a Luddite, though.

Seems like it's just a comment written by someone with little to no experience using zig.

Why settle for just one?

I tend to expand TLS thread-local storage, so SSL is less confusing for me.

To paraphrase Rainer Wolfcastle - the budgets do nothing!

You get a warning. There's no service cutoffs or hard limits on spending.

The external fuel tank, whence came the foam that stuck the wing, leading to the loss of Columbia.

I've tried mosh several times and always found it to be more annoying than tmux/screen + living with the reality of dropped connections on mobile.

> Since I suppose none of the browser vendors will give developers money to change their xslt usage in codebases for something else.

Let's turn that around: are you willing to pay a browser vendor to keep supporting xslt so you can keep your codebase unchanged?

Unless it comes from the Commie region of Asia, it's just sparkling state capitalism.