This isn't a bad thing if the things the framework does aren't terribly useful for what you want to accomplish.

I don't believe the assertion was that these genes are ethnogenetic. I find gp's assertion dubious as well, but I think you may have misunderstood it.

Since you seem to have doubt to the name you were fishing for, I've heard the term intrusive thoughts.

Thanks, that's the term I was looking for.

Personally, I've seen a number of individuals (mostly Zoomers) upset by the void of purpose left by the deliberate aimlessness of postmodernist thinking turning to religion for answers. They can't articulate it like that, but they have consistent things they mention that led them to this, "I've been told my whole life to do what I want and I don't even know what I should want, let alone what I do want." "I feel like I've lived my life just laying around doing nothing, and now I feel like I suddenly woke up from a long sleep." Outcry against cancel culture has similar subtext to it.

It's an argument that cars and bicycles don't mix well.

You both fundamentally misunderstand. American conservatives don't trust the government to do right by the people. It's as simple as that.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks like this. Every time I read someone referring to, "a DevOps," I wonder what they think they're referring to. No one person is going to be everything you need for effective development and operations combined outside of small, extremely focused scope. DevOps is about avoiding the, "Just throw it over the wall," mentality, not making one person handle the whole thing.

>I wonder what they think they're referring to

This and

>DevOps is about avoiding the, "Just throw it over the wall," mentality, not making one person handle the whole thing.

this are why it's now part of my interview process when I'm interviewing for a new role "how does your company/team define DevOps?" and I listen very closely for things that sound like 'over the wall-Ops'. Admittedly having the fortune at this point in life to be quite judicious about the answers given.

Ostensibly, if I'm applying for a 'DevOps' role, I shouldn't have to do this if the job description is written well enough, yet even then this has become a learned behavior even when coming across the rare well-articulated job req.

Care to elaborate? The connection is not clear to me. Fine movements of fingers and arms isn't exactly the same as intensive full body work.

How is building a ride sharing network not an area with high barriers to entry?

Has this actually held up? My understanding is that what specific and specialized areas of work on off-time is considered company IP have to be enumerated, and must depend upon availability of unusual proprietary information.

I haven't found any cases in my (admittedly brief) search that actually rule on this, but there's a pretty clear pattern in CA jurisprudence that suggests that a broad application of "related work" is unlikely to be looked upon positively. To me, it's pretty clear that use of trade secrets would be about the only thing that courts are _likely_ to agree upon as out of bounds for personal work.