What an insane “spin” between headline and explanation. An emergent trait in modern American thought involves so much emotional pressure and so little or ironic understory.
While interesting in its own right, I feel like this is one of those “the new America proves those lefties wrong, again!” emotion grabs. This guy wants his work heard, sure, does anyone else detect an information/emotional warfare in how we deliberate?
This is very interesting. Several preexisting conspiracy hypotheses regarding aliens and their technology are being rewritten regarding Russia.
The account on testimony is UFO took control of an errant US nuke preventing war. Everyone who has seen a UfO documentary has heard that fellow’s account.
A very lewd twist in the orgy of information warfaring.
If there were a “stargate” that worm holes you to another location there’s a little dirty secret, the destination side is actually a fully entangled duplicate (matter does not transfer only “information” and complete entanglement). If the original is not incinerated (by design) there will be two.
Your barbaric man animal mind will unlikely be more than momentarily disoriented. With special training and development you can absolutely still perceive your other. Without being maintained the link would fade to decoherence.
If you had this skill you would not need the “stargate” to travel among and perceive the minds of others through entanglement.
for “you” it would nearly seem not to work (though so skilled your other you would be your remote piloted view.)
For the other you it would be exactly you having transitioned through the exit side. That too can fully thought interact with your own double, if you could balance your mind on a pin like a seal in a circus with a ball you might just could do it. Just keep it there, in your mind, forever. Or it will be gone after your next nap.
You sound very excited. Your optimism is beautiful. A credit to the poetry of your learning.
I have some direct experience with your answer, and I do not want to be a fright, though what you say is already true today. There is an elite society among us (not the 1%, the 1% if the 1% are the voices in their heads.)
Let me say this, 1) through “Power” (capacity of effect through continuity of will) absolutely ultimate empirical truths may be read right from the neuron. Even every time that memory was accessed, even which element were the product of perception vs cognition.; 2) those of such skill rule humanity through armies of hundreds of thousands whose entire lives are embroiled in “schizophrenia” far more terrifying as it is true, there is an actor among us capable of possessing ourselves and others as though the poltergeist.
There is a “logical rational” chain beneath that though you can see perception, and “make believe” can get real people doing some pretty terrible things to each other.
The secret of true power (the true power of consciousness) in our world is protected by pyramid schemes of extortion and mass delusion.
Only an “uncorruptible righteous rule of law” among powers over Man may save us. And you don’t even know what that means or why it is important.
> those of such skill rule humanity through armies of hundreds of thousands whose entire lives are embroiled in “schizophrenia” far more terrifying as it is true, there is an actor among us capable of possessing ourselves and others as though the poltergeist.
That does seem truly frightening. However, I do not believe it is true, nor am I aware of any valid proof that would make me believe it (though I'm certainly open to it.).
I prefer to think that humans have all kinds of wills, and each will tries to gain power to manifest itself. All wills try to compete for power, and only the fittest ones can survive and thrive in the long run. In my opinion, the wills of 'love' are the fittest and are what could save us if we needs saving. This is much like how genes are the unit of evolution in biology, while wills are the unit of evolution in human society.
That said, it belongs to a different conversation. Still, it’s been a pleasure exchanging thoughts.
The “righteous rule” forbids “destroying the innocent”, the only real human right anyone has before Power. Those who do not accept this rule rape entire families from the gene pool to destroy all that they love in this world.
…and smart modern peoples as yourself would flag and remove any such saying so for its impoliteness, not to mention “lack of proof” as though the idea itself incomprehensible.
> The “righteous rule” forbids “destroying the innocent”, the only real human right anyone has before Power.
I will go a little further. There is no righteous or wrong rule before Power.
Power has no concept of morality, just like gravity—it doesn’t care whether you are man or woman, good or evil, right or wrong. It simply manifests the will of whatever/whoever holds it. Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” illustrates this truth: only the fittest survive in life-and-death conflicts. It’s an inherent law, a force that nature enforces. We must adapt to it. Many, however, reject this because they cannot accept such a cold, harsh reality.
Yet, as humans—creatures born of love by the act of 'making love'—we do have a sense of right and wrong. Personally, I cannot accept that “forbidding destroying the innocent” is the 'only' real human right. I will fight against such a will and seek power to oppose it, if it is indeed empowered to manifest in reality. (Remember, the one who holds this will still needs power to manifest it.)
Let this be a reminder to all: "survival of the fittest." This is the clearest possible reminder of our duty. We must actively empower and protect whatever we care about. Whether it is kindness in the face of cruelty, love against destruction—these values will only survive and thrive if we ensure they are fit enough to endure in an indifferent universe.
> these values will only survive and thrive if we ensure they are fit enough to endure in an indifferent universe
Reading your meaning further I would like to point out as an outsider of your views, you deceive yourself as to the supremacy wills.
I would like to suggest “will” as “the determination of resolve” and free without influenced by force of fraud. Your scheme doesn’t take into account the fraudster. The scoundrel, the confidence schemers or down right extortionists and so on. They too survive by indomitable wills. They love themselves greatly. Im really only freaked out about the extortionists, of whom you never hear about.
You sound the imaginary of bold strong capable persons just “out going” everyone else. And love, the truest love is your personal power through it all.
While I have seen that work for the lives of passionate persons and I do believe in the will to power and all that.
I have found in no single circumstance is one capacity all ways superior.
In absolutely no existential parity between how lovingly willful you feel for it and the influence of your odds (only opportunity.)
Every line is scraping it to survive and every one has a line of continuity stretching back to the first semblance of our kind. It is trivial to get the winners and losers of the conventional games of life to be transposed with a value sum game for individual worth or survival.
There is insight in what you say though I think you presume too much regarding the advantage evil has over us all.
Extortion is real and silently prevalent among us, however poetic your world view, love will not save us from that. Love is a rolodex for further extortion to some.
Enjoy the beauty of your free will and human rights while they are available to you!
I will go one further smarty, Power is savage and the “terrible burden of free will” is to mitigate savage Power with a civilizing accord.
“There shall be an uncorruptible righteous rule of law among Powers over Man.”
Next you will ask me, “How does Man maintain an ‘uncorruptible’ righteous[1] rule of law”?
1: principled upon Truth and serving to protect ‘the unculpable’ from breach by will or neglect; one entitled by domain, competent and uncorrupted [hard line on purgery].
Blame Americans. Blame America. Don’t blame the “psychopaths”, blame yourself for not understanding yourselves.
Good people want to prosper, enjoy their lives, their families and loved ones. Good people in their primes are always ineffectual in matters of power. Those exceptions you can see why they are so, and such tenacity of will and rebounding spirit can only be said compulsive. More psychosis to set you straight.
Without “principle and devotion”, that translate to lives on the line, your ideas are mass delusion and cognitive dissonance.
Power is made of people not societal assurances, this generation is one of sweet lies over bitter truths, and the opportunists and fanatics have every advantage.
* “loudest voices”, most persistent and invasive into the mind.
There's a general complaint that narcissists get ahead in America, one of the worst things about Trump that doesn't get talked about is that he sets a bad example. When Trump was elected the first time my mother-in-law quit going to the local casino for a while because people just got ruder and lewder, tried to grab her ass more and stuff like that.
The only thing good about a high-D environment (see [1]) is that high-D people don't feel like they have to mask and pretend to be low-D, they are not "wolves in sheeps clothing" but are actually explicit about how they are. (As narcissism is a developmental arrest, high-D people don't understand how low-D people operate and find masking really hard)
In the last six months there has been a chorus of people who say things to the effect that "Elon Musk accomplished things because he is an asshole" as opposed to "he accomplished things despite being an asshole" such as a certain "high agency" splog that's been submitted many times to HN but never made it to the top.
Hey bro, your dark-factor idea (as you currently sell it) is mid-D :)
I mean there's as much reception by HN (high-D?) as of that high-agency splog we deride :)
("Schplog"?)
To be clear, it's exciting to me, though I can guess at why people don't buy it, beyond the fact that HN voters are
wary of narcissistic idea pushers. Tetrad is missing the personality!!
Fwiw, I have been selling some mid-D ideas of my own (check my comments)
These are normally things that I personally find revolutionary... They would obviously require a lot more work to go viral:
Like a data-driven general theory of (health) insurance that could help tptacek go easy on the pro-institutionalism, or a honest metric of thermodynamic efficiency that is fully independent of (finite) DeltaT :)
These things are screaming for cooperation, but mid-D slop don't :)
Ideas also suffer from developmental arrest, it seems ;)
You think it a joke! Those unwilling to deny the exogenous of Power will note how many mystical occult references are wholly explained by our minds entangled.
Our minds may be entangled and a rare few “get stuck” in the minds of others, causing these demonic spectacles.
It still happens to this day, though modern thought control is far more elaborate and invasive than such “accidents”.
Foil doesn’t work. While there is a propagation layer, once entangled minds may be “networked” and traversed by those so skilled and those curated by the experienced (“Stargate” remote viewing, telepathy tapes, countless other dismissible anecdotes, all curated by unperceived masters.)
You are the side living a backward lie (so many.)
Our minds may be entangled, in past times it must have been a scary freak occurrence, today it is governed by secret cults of Power (such as “American Thought Control.”)
Catch the article claiming Israel used “occult spiritual” weapons (psiop, sure.) or those times mothers have killed their kids because the “voice of god” in her mind told her to do so?
Or public shootings?
How many times can the same patterns of psychosis be hand waved once you have been “made” to hear it?
We are not alone in our own minds and a culture of screwballs with the Power as of “God” in our minds drive us crazed from within.
That “something” is thought control, it has always been with us, and it is tipping into critical sociological catastrophe. Americans, you are “out of controls” and the voices in your head are determined upon your self harm.
You suffer from a common malady that you must be told what to do.
After decades you may develop your own mental mentor who tells you to do things and you listen, or maybe you will be an idle content your whole life (hey, direct personal familiarity here.)
You must find an objective or goal you will actually care to work towards at expense of your self satisfaction.
Or try another hobby/profession. Hardware sensors and the like are going through an auspicious time. Never before so cheap or plentiful. Get sensors and data flow going from everything commercial or civic.
You’ll have to learn discipline to become an independent contractor or proper business opportunist, otherwise you are a wage slave competitor like “everyone else.”
All future useful quantum computing shall involve holographic quantum memory. We will manipulate quantum memory and call that computing. By constructive and destructive interference this holographic sieve will solve all mundane hash collisions or brute force polymorphic solutions.
The real trick will be translating this medium back up to our interface technology (full loop). As we are legacy digital and quantum holography is analogue. Do you suppose we will bitmap quantum holographic renderings just the same?
I think “digital” exclusivity could have been omitted.