I don't think this is necessarily entitlement. There are heteredox but popular economic theories (such as MMT) that view public debt issuance at least in part as a method to satisfy the demand for private savings.

Anki seems to be a habitual offender, I was never able to install it reproducibly and in an obvious way on several distros and always ended up building it from source.

The irony of course being that the "off-the-shelf" something in fact needs to be adapted to an ever-shifting set of requirements, and then does not "work".

Not Matthew Butterick (nor all major English-language style guides): https://practicaltypography.com/one-space-between-sentences....

I only discovered two spaces after a full stop/period was a thing after moving to the U.S., and only apparently in people over 40.

I learned of it only by learning by Emacs! There are movement keys to move the to the next/previous sentence, and I wasn't understanding why they never worked for me.

It's how Millennials and our predecessors were taught to type in school, and it's muscle memory. Very hard to unlearn.

It's not that I have any trouble doing one or two spaces. I just think it's a bit arrogant of any group to decide something is "wrong".

Also, Pluto is still a planet because the new planet definition is absolutely stupid, and it wasn't really their word to work with anyway.

Is this a LLM-generated rehash of this preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.23807 ?

The figures are identical but uncredited/plagiarized...

This appears to be plagiarized (?) from this preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23807

Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45743893

Probably experts in rubber-hose cryptanalysis.

And not experts in securing their site from malicious actors using it as a base.

The ultimate question raised by this (very nice) study is really by how much would improving walkability improve exercise target attainment (of course, leaving aside all the other important reasons to improve walkability, both health-related and not).

Based on the extended data figure[0] and raw figure data[1], the authors' simulation suggests that an increase of 60 to 80, or 80 to 100 walkability would each lead to about 6% more of the population reaching the target 150 minutes of activity.

[0]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09321-3/figures/4

[1]: https://github.com/behavioral-data/movers-public/blob/main/d...

You should check out https://rogue-scholar.org/ - full-text archiving and DOIs for science blogs. I use it and it works great.

It's a nice article from Wired in the linked thread.

And from your website:

> What made me turn to the "yup, we're fucked" camp was "Comment tout peut s'effondrer" by Pablo Servigne, Éditions du Seuil, 2015.

That'll make for some light reading next time I head up north. Thanks for the recommendation.