Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kokanator's commentslogin

I think your experience is one of conditioning or even breed type. I have German Wirehair Pointers which I keep in top athletic shape.

When we are in the field they will triple my distance travelled ( verified by GPS ). My outings are typically 8-12 miles and thus 24-36 miles for the dogs. Of course I need to keep them hydrated during this activity.

The behavior of running forward and looking back is most likely what we refer to as checking in. The dog is trying verify where you are heading/doing. In my dog's case they will range out to around 400 yards and then return to with 20 yards and run passed making eye contact as they run by.


This approach allows traditional Gang of Four builder pattern approach to CDK implementation.


Perhaps faith is a type of choice and in either case difficult.

1. We see often where people deny an objective choice. Even those choices that are predominately 'good' and instead choose those that are predominately 'destructive'.

2. A choice to accept forgiveness is exceedingly difficult as the first step is to accept limits of your own power. That is to say, you must accept another's greater ability to forgive than your own.

In either case, regardless of the objective nature of the 'choice' they remain difficult for humans to make.


Every leader should read this and understand it is universally applicable. Not just to AI talent.

View your team in this way and together you will accomplish whatever you set out to do.


AI is NOT going away. Spend serious time to learn how leveraging AI can multiply your output ( quality and quantity ) or get left behind. Practice. Improve. Deliver. Period.

You’ve seen the posts and articles: “I’m inherently better than AI, coding faster and smarter.” Sure, maybe for now—especially if you’re half-assing your AI game. But that edge? It’s vanishing fast.

Stop being so self indulgent.

Become proficient with the tools available to you or get left behind.


Sounds the same as when NFT bros used to reply to skeptics with "enjoy being poor".


Many have seen the writing on the wall, but many are refusing to believe it.


I was unable to locate details regarding how the code/data is used/owned by the service. Clicking on the Legal link simply sends you to the top of the Home Page.

At this time I can't even think about using the tool until I know what you are doing with my information and who owns or has access to it.


thank you so much, working on it

edit: it is on the website now. forgot to add it, mb


Can anyone tell me who ii.inc actually is?


Consumer groups say they've seen a 'dramatic increase' in homeowners dropped from coverage because of aerial images.


In Florida that would be especially concerning as home insurance is very pricy and hard to get


My father worked in a slaughterhouse. The magnets were often recovered in the gut room ( the place where they process guts and hides for the rendering house ). As a result I had/have a pile of these magnets. They actually come in several different forms. I had a few that were covered with some type of plastic and a few others that simply looked like the rough magnets you might find on the back of a fridge magnet just larger. My guess is the farmer would use whatever was actually cheap and available regardless of whether they were "cow magnets".


First a bow to her tremendous courage.

The irony of this moment was the song she was about to perform was "I Believe in You". This would have been the most religious song sung that evening by far.

It was brilliant on her part to separate the failed human organization from her beliefs.

This is what happens when you simply shout someone down. You miss the opportunity to better understand them.

Here is the rehearsal:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C7tAp5X6Zo


> The irony of this moment

The thing about Sinéad is that she was, right until the end, a strong believer in one god and if anything more of a critic of the church due to their betrayal of religious/spiritual/moral principles as hierarchical institutions, rather than their promotion of theistic beliefs.

She always considered herself a theologian, she said at the time of the pope: "Why do we need a pope? Christ doesn't need a representative".

She also later said of converting/"reverting" to Islam: "The reason why I like Islam is, I can keep Christianity and Judaism, which are two religions which I loved and studied.."

While her speaking out against the church would have resonated with many atheists and agnostics at the time, and even more with today's less religiously dominated Western society - it certainly resonates with me for this reason - I think her own perspective was a little different.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: