Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jakelsaunders94's commentslogin

I use it all the time and have worked in several startups which do. For me personally, inline styling is the point. I can open up any tailwind project and see exactly how that element is styled without cmd + clicking around through layers of CSS.

Obviously it’s all personal taste, but in my mind it feels like the successor to bootstrap in a lot of ways.



This is a follow up to my post on getting hacked last week. Hopefully it contains some practical tips on self-hosting Coolify with Hetzner.


Nothing in that container luckily, just what Umami needed to run, so no creds at all. Thanks for the info though!


This is a great shout actually. Thanks for pointing it out!


I've got a whole Hetzner EX41 bare metal server, as opposed to a VPS. It's gotr like 20 services on it.

But yeah it is massively overspecced. Makes me feel cool load testing my go backend at 8000 requests per second though!


Hahaha, I did tell him this afternoon. This is the bloke who has the same password for all his banking apps despite me buying him 1password though. The imminent threat from RCE's just didn't land.


Buying someone 1Pass, or the like, and calling it good is not enough. People using password managers forget how long it takes to visit all of the sites you use to create that site's record, then update the password to a secure one, and then log out and log back in with the new password to test it is good. For a lot of people having a password manager bought for them is going to be over it after the second site. Just think about how many videos on TikTok they could have been watching instead


Yeah, mom and I sat down one afternoon and we changed all of her passwords to long, secure ones, generated by 1Password. It was a nice time! It also helped her remember all of the different services she needs to access, and now they're all safely stored with strong passwords. And it was a nice way to connect and spend some time together. :)


Careful, HN isn't your average IRC channel.


Yeah I did consider just killing it, I'm going to keep an eye on it for a few days with a gun to it just in case.

I was lucky in that my DB backups were working so all my persistence wax backed up to S3. I think I could stand up another one in an hour.

Unfortunately I didn't keep an image no. I almost didn't have the foresight to investigate before yeeting the whole box into the sun!


Enable connection tracking (if it's not already) and keep looking at the conntrack entires. That's a good way to spot random things doing naughty stuff.


I fixed it, apologies for the misinformation.


It still says:

> IT NEVER ESCAPED.

You haven't confirmed this (at least from the contents of the article). You did some reasonable spot checks and confirmed/corrected your understanding of the setup. I'd agree that it looks likely that it did not escape or gain persistence on your host but in no way have you actually verified this. If it were me I'd still wipe the host and set up everything from scratch again[0].

Also your part about the container user not being root is still misinformed and/or misleading. The user inside the container, the container runtime user, and whether container is privileged are three different things that are being talked about as one.

Also, see my comment on firewall: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46306974

[0]: Not necessarily drop-everything-you-do urgently but next time you get some downtime to do it calmly. Recovering like this is a good excercise anyway to make sure you can if you get a more critical situation in the future where you really need to. It will also be less time and work vs actually confirming that the host is uncontaminated.


I did see your comment on Firewall, and you're right about the escape. It seems safe enough for now. Between the hacking and accidentally hitting the front page of HN it's been a long day.

I'm going to sit down and rewrite the article and take a further look at the container tomorrow.


Hey, thanks for taking the time to share your learnings and engage. I'm sure there are HN readers out there who will be better off for it alongside you!

(And good to hear you're leaving the LLMs out of the writing next time <3)


Before rewriting the article, roll out a new server. Seriously. It seems you do not have the skills yet to do a proper audit. It’s better to roll out a pristine server. If that is a lot of work, it is a good moment to learn about declarative system configuration.

At any rate, this happening to you sucks! Hugs from a fellow HN user, I know that things like this can suck up a lot of time and energy. It’s courageous to write about such an incident incident, I think it’s useful to a lot of other people too, kudos!


I still see Puppeteer mentioned several times in your post and don't understand what that has to do with Umami, nextjs, and/or CVE-2025-66478.


Yeah fair, I asked claude to help because honestly this was a little beyond my writing skills. I'm real though. Sorry. Will change


Seconding what others have said about preferring to read bad human writing. And I don’t want to pick on you – this is a broadly applicable message prompted by a drop in the bucket – but please don’t publish articles beyond your ability to fact check. Just write what you actually know, and when you’re making a guess or you still have open questions at the end of your investigation, be honest about that. (People make mistakes all the time anyway, but we’re in an age where confident and detailed mistakes have become especially accessible.)


Just a data point - I would rather read bad human writing than LLM output


It still says Puppeteer in multiple places.


Hi Jake! Cool article, and it's something I'll keep in mind when I start giving my self-hosted setup a remodel soon. That said, I have to agree with the parent comment and say that the LLM writing style dulled what would otherwise have been a lovely sysadmin detective work article and didn't make me want to explore your site further.

I'm glad you're up to writing more of your own posts, though! I'm right there with you that writing is difficult, and I've definitely got some posts on similar topics up on my site that are overly long and meandering and not quite good, but that's fine because eventually once I write enough they'll hopefully get better.

Here's hoping I'll read more from you soon!


Thanks for the encouragement! I find it difficult to write articles beyond simply stating a series of facts.

I tried handwriting https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/schemaless-search-in-postgres/ bit I thought it came off as rambling.

Maybe I'll have a go at redrafting this tomorrow in non LLM-ese.


> I tried handwriting https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/schemaless-search-in-postgres/ bit I thought it came off as rambling.

There is nothing wrong with this article. Please continue to write as you; it's what people came for.

LLMs have their place. I find it useful to prompt an LLM to fix typos and outright errors and also prompt them to NOT alter the character or tone of the text; they are extraordinarily good at that.


This is much more pleasent to read and it gives a great insight into your actual thought process. Thanks for sharing and great writeup.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: