Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | iso1631's commentslogin

They got Al Capone on tax fraud

Relevant history from the US Airforce in the 1940s when they tried to build a cockpit for the average pilot and failed

I find this an interesting take on the story

https://polkas.github.io/posts/cursedim/


This is also a good argument why "opinionated" designs like from Apple are a bad idea. The average user does not exist. Stop trying to turn us into one!

I have used an iPhone for 8 years and a macbook for 2 years. Every year the experience gets worse, like on schedule. This theory might explain what is happening!

Same with Windows; that's why I switched to Linux.

That’s different. Deciding you’re building a tool for a specific use-case is not related to “average users”.

Tool companies manufacture claw hammers despite some people wanting a nail gun. You don’t try to make a thing flexible enough to be both a nail gun and a hammer.

I’m a power user and I do all of my customization on my Linux desktop/laptop. I use an iPhone specifically because it’s locked down and don’t want a keyboard that has gone through no code review stealing all of my banking credentials.


From the article, it seems like even if we only consider one dimension, there'd be ~70% of pilots that are uncomfortable. I'd have thought to at least cover 1 standard deviation, thus covering 68% of "average" pilots. But with 10 dimension it'd still only cover measly 2% of them. If we go to 2 std (95%), the 10-power would be ~60%. Quite small but seems acceptable if the initial target is only ~30% of pilots.

But of course this assume all variables are independent. Seems like we could actually push the tolerance much lower than this raw math would suggest.


Most posters on HN barely know what a subnet is so it's not that simple

There's two key features

1) Tunnel management

Tailscale will configure your p2p tunnels itself - if you have 10 devices, to do that yourself you'd have to manage 90 tunnels. Add another device and that goes upto 100. Remove a device and you have 9 other devices to update.

2) Firewall punching

They provide an orchestration system which allows two devices both behind a nat or stateful firewall to communicate with each other without having to open holes in the firewall (because most firewalls will allow "established" connections - including measuring established UDP as "packet went from ipa:porta to ipb:portb 'outbound', thus until a timeout period any traffic from ipb:portb to ipa:porta will be let through (and natted as appropriate)".

The orchestration sends traffic from ipa to ipb and ipb to ipa on known ports at the same time so both firewalls think the traffic is established. For nats which do source-port scrambling it uses the birthday paradox to get a matching stream.

I believe you can run a similar headend using "headscale" yourself.


> Watsi donors have donated over $20M to fund 33,241 surgeries

I don't get this. Why wouldn't your normal healthcare cover the surgery?


> "Personal Computing" is going to become a luxury of the past, and we’ll all be terminal-renters in someone else's data center.

These things are cyclical.


cooperation.

Sure you have to isolate certain rogue states - North Korea, Russia, USA. Always the way.


> I’m just afraid that prices of $everything will go up soon and will not come down anymore, like they did after Covid.

Just like the price of labour. Your salary went up and doesn't come down

In the UK weekly earnings increased 34% from December 2019 to December 2025.

CPI went up 30% in the same period.

Obviously that CPI covers things which went up more, and things which went up less, and your personal inflation will be different to everyone elses. Petrol prices end of Jan 2020 were 128p a litre, end of Jan 2025 they are 132p a litre [0]. Indeed petrol prices were 132p in January 2013. If you drive 40,000 miles a year you will thus see far lower inflation than someone who doesn't drive.

[0] https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/fuel-watch/


Amazing how many people on the internet refuse to accept basic facts

> he was convicted in 2015 of two counts of open and gross lewdness for displaying his genitals to a neighbor through the window of his home

So he was naked in his own home?

#Land of the free


It's all about levels here.

First level? Open and gross lewdness for the home owner.

Third level? Voyeurism for the person outside.


The disgusting, gross lewdness of a naked body. Thank God someone did something.

A peer message quoted the PDF of the things he did, before finally getting put on a registry. It wasn't just being naked in his home to say the least. The message was auto-flagged because of its content.

So 17 year old there's no access, then on your 18th birthday go nuts, completely unprepared?

> 2. attempting to not waste time if the candidate's expectations are way out of line with the amount the company is willing to pay.

Good reason for them to say what they're willing to pay before I bother reading their job advert


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: