How hard would it be to do a comparative analysis, say of Vision Pro, Oculus, and Quest? Does that capability exist? Or is it more of a summarization/vision board thing?

The UI looks great, btw.

Very easy! You just need to ground it with the right data sources. Eg. you can add a web search datasource for "oculus reviews", and then add a table component to your canvas, instructing it to provide a comparative analysis.

The source material doesn't need to provide a comparative analysis itself: as long as it finds data detailing Vision Pro specs (which it already found) and Oculus specs it'll be able to do the analysis.

Canvases also have memory and auto-refresh, so once it finds the specs it can remember them across refreshes/updates, but also incorporate any new information it finds.

Here you go, AVP vs Quest 3: https://jumprun.ai/share/canvas/01HNXG4VK47Y0J1CC403Z6JSM0

This is almost spooky... it produced the results of my typical google research process. Thanks for this, I'm impressed.

i'm in the market for a remote position. is that something that would work here? or is this only for locals or those able to move to the bay area?

Checkout my repo https://github.com/lukasz-madon/awesome-remote-job

i will, thanks!

this is what i love about the internet. you're a great person. i also thank you on sean's behalf :)

from my experience, this is all 100% accurate. medtech is a shit show.

however, from another perspective, it's exactly the type of "schlep" that mints millionaires.

I totally agree, but it's not going to be the kind of quick money making endeavor that attracts people from finance.

totally agree. i think it's why many many many tech managers aren't technical. most truly technical people cannot put up with the cognitive dissonance required to convincingly say one thing while believing the opposite.

cool. how about a comment on its usefulness? code quality? breadth of TOS it has ratings for?

"it's been around for years" doesn't add much value.

Website's user design is bad- opening "more details" in a new tab, for example, just redirects to the homepage. It's also not very filled out- major services like DuckDuckGo and Instagram just have stub pages.

The problem with this website is that 99% of the users will never run into an issue with the TOS, and the 1% that do, will need a lawyer, not a TL;DR website. It's not very needed, nor does it do a good job at presenting the info it should.

You missed the (fairly obvious) point of the website, which is to advocate for better terms of service through public ratings and advocacy, not help people with individual legal issues.

And the reason why opening "more details" isn't doing what you want it to is that it's not another web page, it's a modal dialogue -- ie, part of the current web page. You can argue (reasonably) that modals aren't good design, but it's definitely doing what it's intended to do.

And what potential stub pages are you even talking about?

He wasn't doing that at all. His point was that autism skews male and then suggests that the traits of Aspergers make good programmers. It was a comment on why there are more men than women in tech fields. Relevant excerpt below:

"In an earlier post I noted that many software developers I've known have traits of Aspergers. Aspergers is a spectrum disorder; the more severe the symptoms, the closer it is to autism. And did you know that autism skews heavily towards males at a 4:1 ratio?

Interesting. I might even go so far as to say some of those traits are what makes one good at programming."

He's confusing his correlation, tantamount to saying being a White Protestant are traits that makes one a good President of the United States. That the historical traditions of programming may have selected for those traits does not mean that the traits make one better at programming than others. It may just be that hiring managers came up through that history and select for culture fit based upon their identity.

we have one side of the story, for fuck's sake. the other side--the github side? it's lawyer-speak and completely devoid of anything that addresses the specific accusations.

how so many ostensibly smart people can simultaneously lose their ability to think critically is incredible. add the word "gender" to anything and people lose their minds.

i've been playing with elixir for a little while. i'm still wrapping my head around all its metaprogramming goodness, but so far it's been a fun journey.

also, jose valim must have clones of himself.

i usually don't jump into these debates, but your comment strikes me as at best impossibly naive and at worst inexcusably ignorant. take a look at the various laws being passed to disenfranchise minority/elderly voters. look at the misinformation being spread via special interest-controlled media. read up on Edward Snowden. "victim blaming" is 100% what you're doing here.

i agree with your stance that action needs to be taken, but completely disagree that we have "no one to blame but ourselves".

If the situation is as bad as my interpretation o your comment then I don't think there are any realistic alternatives to violence. I don't want to put my eggs in that basket, so I'm going to blame the victims.