Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | grishka's commentslogin

I've seen HDMI devices for sale on AliExpress that list their port as "HDMI-compatible" or just "HD" to avoid that certification requirement.

Russia is definitely not the same. I suspect they are still largely using (pirated) Microsoft products but cloud services hosted abroad are a big no-no.

There's another inscrutable mystery in physics, the nature of consciousness. Time might as well be an artifact of that. I'm surprised this article doesn't mention this possibility.

Here's an interesting lecture about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YusrOYGAhqM


The first problem with the nature of consciousness is describing what you mean by it. Try, and I guarantee you that someone will find a sponge, Apple product, or bathroom slipper that meets that definition.

Electro-magnetic radiation, on the other hands, is highly describable in precise, testable, repeatable terms.

When you can state Maxwell's Laws of Consciousness, we'll talk. And rename them "Grishka's".


> consciousness. Time might as well be an artifact of that.

Psychedelics can remove the sensation of time passing. But they are also modifying the experience of "consciousness" itself.


I got downvoted on here not so long ago for mentioning time as an emergent property of quantum consciousness so maybe it's controversial.

I was downvoted for saying that our cosmological model might be wrong because "dark matter" sounds like a crutch.

Now JWST has collected enough evidence that it might, in fact, be wrong.


Dark matter absolutely is a crutch.

It's "dark" in the sense that the (fabled) Dark Ages were dark. They didn't have more cloud cover then. And dark matter is 'dark' as in 'inobservable, except by gravitational attraction'. So we admit it might not even be "matter" by any definition we have; it's just what we're calling this invisible, untouchable, silent elephant in the room. That is very heavy. And might not be an elephant.

Honestly, "invisible matter" might have been a better term, but that too would have been misinterpreted.


Honestly, just saying the maths doesn’t always work is much more approachable than dark/invisible matter.

Doesn't the protection usually work such that it prevents reading the firmware but still allows you to erase and reflash it?

Assuming the other commenter is correct and the mcu is a clone of an ST product, then it's possible that the protection are fuses that destroy the pathways to the memory. They're one-time writable and cannot be undone. At my work that is how we protect our firmware with a similar ST product.

I'm not sure how it works in-silicon. Would be interesting to know how... but it's sunday afternoon


> In the end it'll likely end with whitelists of allowed IP addresses

I already had this idea of tunneling traffic through the voice/video calls in the Max messenger app. No one has done it in practice, yet, but I see no reason why it should not be possible.

Обход блокировок, который ловит даже на парковке ;)


That does not seem like a good idea at all. Even if you are “not doing something stupid” the fact that you would be circumventing their app to bypass censorship they may deem you treasonous and a possible risk. Who knows what they could arrest you for.

Law enforcement in Russia works differently than in the US, especially in politically charged fields. An exapmel: in the US, one man was charged of breaking construction codes because he was doing chemical experiments in the basement of his single-family house, in a block zoned accordingly.

I understand this is extreme, but a good illustration. He was doing something on his own, and was charged. Such enforcement is extremely unlikely in Russia even in todays situation. For instance, a recent law explicitly banned _searching_ for extremists materials, e.g. Navalny's party website (they're labelled as extremists ex-court by the Interior or the Justice ministry, I don't remember). But there's been just 1 court case since then. You can search whatever you want as long as you're not public about it. As soon as you get enough publicity, you do get on the radar.

Same kinds of examples: in the 1950's USSR some musicians were shadow-banned (there was no legal ban on them), and not published. A man made a lathe and carved disks with their music on used x-ray films. He was arrested when he got enough publicity and sold good deal of copies. He was charged not for copying them -- there was no ban on this -- but for illicit enterpreneurship, or speculation as it was called back then. Had he been doing this alone, he'd probably have not got under arrest.

I actually, think it's roughly the same as dealing with Torrent and trackers in the Western world nowadays.


Technically, the act of bypassing censorship by itself is still not even illegal. They did make it recently such that writing about VPNs is grounds for blocking wherever you've written about it.

https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/2024-11-22_v_rossii_zapretili_...


> Technically, the act of bypassing censorship by itself is still not even illegal

Seeking extremist materials is illegal as of September. If that is not "bypassing censorship" then what is?

By the way. Extremist materials is a big list of thousands of things that no one can always know. What it means for a normal person? If you use VPN you can be finding extremist materials, if you don't = then you don't (because they are all helpfully blocked)

After 3 months there is one guy with a case for looking up Azov for example https://meduza.io/amp/cards/mvd-vpervye-popytalos-oshtrafova...


great idea. use the app tied to your passport and gosuslugi to make sure they know who is the genius when they detect it.

edit: didn't know they allow anything except belarus, cool... as long as you can anonymously register that number


I don't think they would care as long as you don't do something stupid that would show up on their dashboards. But if you're paranoid, you can use phone numbers from, for example, Armenia or Kazakhstan. There are 8 countries besides Russia whose numbers they allow.

Yes, we have to use censorship circumvention tools to make the internet usable. Especially when it's mobile data. About a year ago I got fed up enough that I bought an OpenWRT router and installed Zapret on it. Now, at least while at home, I can mostly forget that internet censorship is a thing.

Zapret isn't good enough, because a lot of random websites geoblock RU via Cloudflare. you'd be better off with a VPN running on a cheap VPS.

Of course I also have a VPN that I selectively route traffic through, in just these kinds of situations.

VPNs on cheap VPSes are blocked quite a lot too.

Apple Watch requires an iPhone. There are many people who use a Mac but can't stand iOS.

> Apple Watch requires an iPhone.

I’m no Apple salesperson, but, no.

Once you set the watch up, you can throw the phone in a lake, and retain most if not all major features.

Especially the cellular models.


"once you set the watch up"

This does require an iPhone though, right?


Access to someone’s, once.

An achievable bar for people buying Dick Tracy computers.


if i remember right, to activate the security (touch id like) feature you need the phone to be on your account. there are more restrictions than just pure activation.

Even for cellular models?

That seems…ripe for disruption.

Why is nobody selling a cellular standalone watch?

Not enough units to make manufacturing worth it?

Is this a chicken-and-egg problem?


I call this "touchscreenification"

Oh yeah I added a CLAUDE.md to my project the other day: https://github.com/grishka/Smithereen/blob/master/CLAUDE.md

Is it a good one?


Definitely a good one - probably one of the best CLAUDE.md files you can put in any repository if you care about your project at all.

I copy/pasted it into my codebase to see if it’s any good and now Claude is refusing to do any work? I asked Copilot to investigate why Claude is not working but it too is not working. Do you know what happened?

Do remember that using LLMs is a choice. And unlike, say, social media, by not using any AI at all, you aren't missing out on anything.

>Do remember that using LLMs is a choice.

Not if nearly every company I attempt to interact with has their way. As other commenters have said, smart phones used to be a choice as well. Now people look at you funny if you won't install an app or don't have a data plan.


> Do remember that using LLMs is a choice.

That seems like a naive take on technology to me. Once having/using a smartphone was a simple matter of personal choice. Once, having a car was a choice. If society as a whole adapts to something it's hard to be against it.


You're not missing much of value by skipping out on social media, either.

I choose not to use any LLM, but technologies should still be judged on their potential for evil even if they are a choice.

And choice is a very loaded concept that does not take us anywhere: if the market is creating a world where LLM usage is central to a more productive future, or so they want us to believe, the choice quickly becomes between participating in the brainwashing and subtle advertising, or having a hard time finding a job that depends on LLM usage.

Ultimately, humans depend on habit and lowest friction. You cannot expect everyone to make a ‘virtuous’ choice and it is dishonest to even expect that. I dislike that many of my clothes are made my underpaid people in third-world countries, but at this point I don’t really have time and energy to choose not to unless I make that my life goal, as does the rest of the world.

This reminds me of the discussion about gun control by the way.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: