Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more fwr's commentslogin

This is new to me and I've been doing this very thing for a while (though not yet with an accident) - do you have a source for this?


It sounds like it's probably an insurer specific thing so I'd check the small print. I'd be very surprised if it was a legislative thing.


Any mentions of the refresh rate? I've been waiting for a 4K/5K display that supports 120 Hz to pair nicely with my 2021 MBP, but it looks like the only available options so far are funky gaming displays: https://tonsky.me/blog/monitors-mac/


It's almost surely 60hz since they didn't brand it as "ProMotion" display like they did with iPhone, Macbook Pro, and iPad Pro


60hz, there isn't enough port bandwidth in TB4 to handle 5K @ 120hz. Anything coming close to being capable enough is years away still.


No, there is with DSC. 144Hz with HDR, or 180Hz with SDR. Or even 240Hz with two HBR2 streams.



Looks like 60hz. I don't think anybody has 5k/120hz working yet.


Yup, i feel like nobody cares about monitor tech, i waited for 4k/120hz IPS for a long time


It's not that nobody cares, it's just that this stuff is genuinely hard. We're too spoiled.


If you sit far enough away from it, you could try a 48 inch LG CX OLED tv. 120 Hz, OLED, 4K


How?


How is there bikeshedding? Almost all arguments people make against bitcoin are pointless. I.e. the fees being high, transaction time being low, transactions per second, ect

Blockchain is a disruptive technology on the same level as the invention of the Internet. It is the first global, transparent, immutable ledger. We are only just beginning discovery on what we can do/improve from here.


True, people debate on these little details and none of them matter, they will be solved one way or another. It's guaranteed that cryptocurrencies are here to stay. Most people don't understand that cryptos in their current form is just the base and when more and more money start building on top of it that's when we will see the real internet 3.0 and all the amazing things you can do with it. It takes some imagination to see what's possible.


Neat, this helped me realize I haven't switched away from my provider's default DNS when I moved in, which is something I usually do.

How to choose a DNS server? I usually just go with 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4, I used to always test this with Namebench (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namebench) and these always turned out as the fastest - but it looks like it hasn't been updated since 2010 - are there any better tools for this, or any considerations in general? I prefer performance over privacy here, I think privacy should be on a different layer.


Someone else in this thread suggested GRC's benchmark utility [1]. It sounds pretty comprehensive, but I haven't tried it yet.

[1] https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm


Just run your own recursive resolver, it's very easy and reliable (e.g. knot-resolver).


Performance over privacy is a fine tradeoff but if you have the means to, I would recommend avoiding unencrypted unauthenticated DNS over UDP/53. It's probably not a big threat in practice but if someone were to intercept your DNS traffic, they could redirect your internet connections to a different server. TLS (or other forms of authentication) should handle authenticity issues but (probably) not everything on your system mandates TLS.

If I'm not mistaken you can use DNSSEC to authenticate, but not encrypt, your DNS requests. For me however, the simpler way was to just use DoT/DoH. I haven't noticed any slowdowns.

If you care about performance, you could check if your system caches DNS responses and configure that cache accordingly.


You are not mistaken; DNSSEC doesn't encrypt records, and DoH does. DoH also authenticates the channel between you and your name server. It's likely that DoH will ultimately obviate the need for DNSSEC anywhere.


> I think privacy should be on a different layer.

Can you elaborate which layer?


Client devices, I think - filtering that happens transparently and without an easy way to disable is just asking for problems - I couldn't deal with having to log in to the DNS management console every time when a website notices that ads didn't load and therefore doesn't display content. I don't think we're at a point where privacy can be guaranteed by technology choices - it's all about behavior of end users (like avoiding websites which block content if ads don't load ;-)

Is it possible these privacy/filtering DNS services like NextDNS come without a performance hit? Imagine setting it up and forgetting about it, and discovering later that all your DNS queries happened with a substantial lag - it's like realizing you've been driving with a hand brake on


17 days ago - effect of Americanization of Poland (or just extreme ignorance): https://twitter.com/DawidStys/status/1268097702807711745


Is there a more powerful political position he could have?


Yes, he could be a president with reliable support from the senate and the house. But that said he still managed to reach very far.


Is that an option these days? When was the last time that existed?

2010?


It seems to me (as an outside observer), that this normally happens for the two years after a new President is elected.

Normally they don't get 60 in the Senate though, which means that the system is working at intended (you need to stay consistently popular for 6+ years to start swinging the Senate).


Nice! Interesting you were able to agree on licensing with PANTONE®, considering they sell a (very underwhelming) hardware device called CAPSURE™ that has a similar premise: https://www.pantone.com/products/color-control-tools/capsure



Another mirror here: http://archive.is/GXpH6


Caution: spammy website, and this was back in 2014: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/warren-buffett-to-keep-bett...


Each of these could be hosted on postgresql.org:

> Don't Do This: Mistakes we've made in licensing

> Don't Do This: A case for considering MongoDB

> Don't Do This: Handbook for social behavior at events & conferences


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: