It presents a thought I have not thought about before. Whether, as some other commenters suggest, the hypothesis that you are dating an ecosystem, has always been true is a different question.
This article is peiced to tug at emotional heartstrings.
Of course people are complex systems. When have you ever felt the thoughts:
"I am the same person I was last year, therefore people should treat me as such and not consider my growth, changes, or nuance."
"My partner is the exact same person they where when I married them, therefore I do not need to pay attention to their growth, changes, or nuance."
You realized these things before you read the piece, but like me, found solace in seeing this "author" rationalize it as not our fault, but instead the fault of the new society/the other.
Which...is certainly not wise for sake of self-growth.
The results indicate a wide variety of vegetables, fruits, beeswax and animal food products, complementing other archaeological evidence. The authors highlight some notable differences between rural and urban cuisines, including the greater frequency of grapes and dairy products in the rural site.
"[...] learnable network parameter that is iteratively adjusted during the training process of the diffractive network, using an error back-propagation method. After this numerical training phase implemented in a computer, the D^2NN design is fixed and the transmission/reflection coefficients of the neurons of all the layers are determined. This D^2NN design, once physically fabricated using e.g., 3D-printing, 3lithography, etc., can then perform, at the speed of light propagation, the specific task that it is trained for, using only optical diffraction and passive optical components/layers, creating an efficient and fast way of implementing machine learning tasks."
I've been using R intensively for almost two decades, and Python for about half that time. I enjoy using them both and think they're great languages. I don't think it's an either-or thing, because they both have something to offer.
At the same time, they also have a lot of weaknesses, most of which are summarized by the Julia benchmarks (https://julialang.org/benchmarks/). You can criticize these particular benchmarks, but similar patterns emerge in lots of other benchmarks.
R was never meant to do the heavy lifting it's doing today. Ihaka sort of lamented this fact for a while, and then got ignored as people went on to use it anyway.
Sure, you can wrap things around low-level C/C++/Fortran in either language, but eventually if you find yourself getting into nitty-gritty stuff, the computation and/or memory use of R and Python becomes a problem. It also complicates a task to rely on juggling two platforms at the same time.
Julia is new, but it reminds me a lot of R in its early stages. I started using R when it was in beta because it offered something new, and Julia has a similar feel at the moment. Maybe Julia will die away but it doesn't seem that way to me at the moment. I've seen lots of prospects come and go, and none of them had the same traction as Julia.
If anything will stem the growth of Julia, it probably will be Python. Javascript saw a lot of performance gains after Google and other players invested heavily into it as part of the mobile ecosystem. It seems like Python is getting similar investments now with ML/DL, and I wouldn't be surprised if Google, et al. started dumping tons of resources into PyPy or something in the same way you saw javascript implementations getting that investment. At the same time, if you look at benchmarks of PyPy, it seems like you might get to the same level as javascript, which isn't the same as Julia (or C++, which is maintaining its relevance, or Rust or Go, which are growing and relevant).
I guess my point is if a student asked me, sure, I'd recommend they prioritize R or Python first, but I would also explain Julia to them and recommend they become familiar with that as well.
Yup. It's already a great, fast, enjoyable language with a couple of excellent libraries, and it's maturing: Apparently release 0.6 is around the corner, and the next one might be 1.0.
It presents a thought I have not thought about before. Whether, as some other commenters suggest, the hypothesis that you are dating an ecosystem, has always been true is a different question.