Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?
MoQs - Mixture of Quibblers? Would be convenient to have them run on dedicated FGPAs. Then they can facilitate near real-time quibbing at the network level across all packets.
I'm researching how we can use technology to improve the way we learn and think.
I'm currently exploring how AI/Natural Language Processing can automatically organize personal knowledge and notes by tagging and linking ideas / content together [0], removing the friction of organization to help you find new connections and ideas.
If you're interested in this domain, I'd love to talk to you!
Nice! Archivy [0] has some of the same goals with integration of web content, also using Readability. Instead of going the highlight route, each article becomes a note in your knowledge base you can edit / add to.
It's really exciting to open source a project, Lurnby looks cool!
What do you use the spaced repetition for?
Woah. Very cool. You seem to make it really easy for people to get started and tick a lot of the boxes around privacy.
Today's been a bit of a nervous day for me actually haha, I didn't really expect this attention. Open sourcing just felt like the right thing to do for this app and because I just don't have all the skills :D
The spaced repetition at the moment is for the highlights. All highlights get marked at an initial level 0 and then move up or down depending on you reviewing them.
Eventually gets to the point where a highlight is shown to you yearly.
In the future I was thinking of doing some spacing around finished books or articles. Things like - you finished reading X 10 days ago, what do you remember?
But don't think I've thought through the details around that enough.
I agree. I think there are several reasons high achievers' mental health issues go untreated:
- like you say they maintain a healthy surface because part of their perfectionism is no one knowing about their anxiety / having a good image
- if they do share, often their goals / expectations will be inflated compared to that of their peers such that for others it feels like they're bragging or being ridiculous, instead of taking their pain seriously. I notice this especially with when I share dissatisfaction about my school results - disparate expectations create a true divide.
I realized that one of the reasons knowledge management is overpowered is that you can create this tapestry of knowledge and ideas compounding off each other, and that's even more true if you integrate it with content from online.
This process is useful but it takes time to link and tag. So I decided to try and see how we could automate it!
Espial creates an auto-generated organization of our knowledge, conceptually and structurally.
This allows you to discover new connections in your ideas and search them based on meaning, not keywords.
this kind of tool is especially useful in longer running tasks to enforce your intent without having to check in on your agent all the time