you do know about the Sun? Earth? and the Moon? where would you get this 4 kelvin?

i think so, next is Quantum right?

i don't understand? you won't insulate the craft from the sun? and you expect the craft to get rid of its heat just from being behind the earth for a moment?

When did I say no insulation? If it took only one moment for the satellite to fly by behind the whole earth, its speed is so great that it would be flung out of the solar system.

but if you did use thermometer in space it would eventual read 2.73 kelvin right? so whats the issue? and also for a space based server it would have to deal with the energy coming from the sun

There is no matter.

It's cold there because there isn't anything there.

So there is nothing to conduct or convect the heat away.

It's like a giant vacuum insulated thermos.

Is putting data centers in thermos' a good idea?

i am not saying its a good idea, just wondering because you say space has no temperature, but that makes no sense for the reason CMB radiation would prevent you from having 0 k right? and in fact how would you even measure it? wouldn't the measuring device its self have way more then 0K?

plus you would have to insulate the servers from the sun...then have radiators like the ISS... i think its just way easier to run a server on the ground

Why did you say "eventually" in your original post? That answers your question.

It's a rate problem

Yes and no.

If you had a thermometer that had no heat generation then yes.

If you have a resistor or other heat generating circuit then you need to have the needed surface area to radiate the heat away. If you don't, it will heat up. It's a rate problem.

what thermometer would you use to measure the temperature of space?

Thermocouples

easy... because 24fps has that dream like feel to it.. second you go past that it starts to look like people on a stage and you loose the illusion... i couldn't watch the hobbit because of it

movies above 24fps won't become a thing, it looks terrible and should be left for documentaries and sports

for me it ruins cinematic content, for sports i don't mind

It ruins it for me as well but from my understanding many people can't tell the difference.

Yes! A lot people can't tell the difference. It's just sad. Tells you how engaged people are with what they they watch.

I briefly feel bad for them but then I remind myself who am I to judge how they perceive things? It is possible that they get the same enjoyment from the story with all the effects and artifacts these TVs have. When I was a kid we had this smallish (probably 14-15") B/W TV set in my kitchen. Sometimes my whole family would watch a movie on that TV set and we were all absorbed into the movies, it didn't matter the TV set was small and colorless, back then I hadn't even seen a TV broadcast in colors. It's all relative I guess. Sometimes I think this soap opera effect is even worse than watching movies on that small TV set form my childhood but then again, who am I to judge?

noo motion smoothing is terrible unless you like soap operas and not cinema, black frame insertion is to lower even more the pixel persistence which really does nothing for 24fps content which already has a smooth blur built in to the image, the best is setting your tv to 120hz so that your 24fps fits evenly and you don't get 3:2 pulldown judder

Unlike older tech OLED has no motion blur as pixel response time is basically instant making panning shots a judderfest when you turn off most settings. You can say thats how it should be, but the way it looked back then is also not how it appears on your OLED. If I go to a proper film projector cinema I don't have a problem watching it.

https://youtu.be/E5qXj-vpX5Q?t=514

> noo motion smoothing is terrible unless you like soap operas and not cinema

That's what's so good about it. They say turning it off respects the artists or something, but when I read that I think "so I'm supposed to be respecting Harvey Weinstein and John Lasseter?" and it makes me want to leave it on.

> black frame insertion is to lower even more the pixel persistence which really does nothing for 24fps content which already has a smooth blur built in to the image

That's not necessarily true unless you know to set it to the right mode for different content each time. There are also some movies without proper motion blur, eg animation.

Or, uh, The Hobbit, which I only saw in theaters so maybe they added it for home release.

> he best is setting your tv to 120hz so that your 24fps fits evenly and you don't get 3:2 pulldown judder

That's not really a TV mode, it's more about the thing on the other side of the TV I think, but yes you do want that or VFR.

Do OLEDs not support 24Hz refresh?

Wonder if this effects the Sony PS5? could be a cool way to exploit the system? i remember you could somehow connect to the redis server its running and even execute lua scripts but that was it

Interesting. Curious if anyone has more details on the PS5 Redis server? I did not know there was one running on the PS5; I wonder what the console uses it for.

I'm a computer programmer and I'm not really worried about it. If it can take my job, then it can take a while slew of other jobs too, and society is in for a big upheaval.

so they where never interested in the first place... but now they can call them self's artists after prompting a AI to make a image....

the level of discipline needed in a trade has gone down in almost every trade, including all mediums of art, for centuries

its not really anyone's problem, and generally limited to the people that made way too much of their identity to be based on a single field, that they feel they have to gatekeep it

its great that people can express themselves closer to their vision now