Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | elischleifer's commentslogin

We already are performing our own unintentional form of geo-engineering with our relentless pumping of CO2 into the air. That said, not sure blocking the sun is our best plan right now for avoiding the worst of climate change. Instead of trying to have our cake and eat it too, we need to accelerate our focus on reducing carbon output, decarbonize electricity and transportation, and invest in massive amounts of energy production to the point where energy is so cheap we can use it to pull carbon from the air.


Agree on the last point, but the net zero strategy is a losing game. We can't reduce fast enough to avoid the multiplier effects (slowing heat exchanges in atmosphere and ocean currents, loss of polar reflectance, thawing of sea floor and boreal methane deposits, etc.).

The only way out at this point is fusion/fission and using excess power to decarbonize.

Population reductions in the developing world would help too, since that's where the majority of global carbon will be emitted over the next 50 years.


Working at Microsoft back in the early 00s I spent a lot of unfriendly hours with windbg. On one particular project we hunted for a terrible crash for months until it was uncovered that we were compiling against the single thread CRT when using threads extensively...whoops


Just another reason not to use dependabot - it's default configuration appears to be created to burn money on GH Actions / Azure.


Just one more reason to actually read the article instead of just assuming its contents say whatever you want.


That's a silly conclusion. This is not dependabot specific - you can achieve the same with any system automatically suggesting merges.


fair point. I think I've just been burned too many times by dependabot looking to update single ts packages with single line changes. it's default configuration is overly aggresive


Dependabot doesn't try to guess what's in the changes. It can't really tell anyway. A trivial 1 line change may be either "this box is now 1px further to the right", or "a critical bug which will delete all your data tomorrow is fixed". It's up to dependabot to report any change available.


Looks like several of the core contributors work for github.

    It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.


May 23, 2019: "Dependabot has been acquired by GitHub and we couldn't be more excited!" https://web.archive.org/web/20190601064131/https://dependabo...


The security breaches be damned - the UI was terrible / constantly prompted me to store credit card info in LastPass and I was just not interested...but couldn't get it to stop this. deleted and moved to Dashlane.


better and better visuals....still looking for a killer app.


I think a lot of the app currently in a phone make more sense on a heads up display. The main problem is the clumsyness of touching your glass to interact with it. And I think Meta neural wristband solves it.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/facebook-is-testing-its-...


This is amazing. Not interested in growing vampire teeth - but the ability to regrow teeth when lost - or get a new set of chompers without coffee stains sounds super cool :)


Another tool that tackles GitHub Action debugging head on: https://www.ci-debugger.io/

Wrap your GH Actions in a debugger breakpoint and connect into the live broken GH Action to inspect the machine, re-run commands etc..

At it's heart - realtime debugging for GitHub actions.


Fisherman's Wharf is the most not-San Francisco part of SF. You know if there is a Hard Rock Cafe that you are not really where the locals dine.


Where do I go where local SF's go? I have a weekend to spare this trip.

https://twitter.com/brajeshwar/status/1672315790736130049


San Francisco is all about the neighborhoods.

Avoid downtown. Spend time exploring the Mission, the Castro, Japantiwn, the Richmond district, the sunset district.

Fire up Google maps and go and explore the orange areas scattered around the city.

For a more specific recommendation: start at Arsicault bakery and then head down Clement St from there.


At some point, drop by OXO Truffles on Columbus Avenue. Great stuff to be had there.


I love the land's end cliff walk starting from here: https://goo.gl/maps/oUNxNPBDhWFhKUeM7. Accessible by bus. You can extend it by going down the coast, through Golden Gate Park and then end up at Haight St for food and lots of interesting stores. Not sure if that's considered touristy.


I still like visiting Chinatown when I get back that way. When I was a kid, dad always took me to the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory, and I still stop there every time. Haven't lived in the Bay Area for almost 10 years now, though.


Oakland. (The intended joke being that peeople visit SF. If you're already in SF you get out. IIRC there's still some kind of community in Oakland)


Hayes Valley, then Lower Haight. It's haight and Fillmore.


Definitely check out Market street. Also the Tenderloin.


Visit South Lake Tahoe and Yosemite.


express pupuseria


Time to short the makers of Goo Gone?


Devil's advocate...how much do we really care about these different distros at this point. The world lives out of the browser. As long as I have chrome and VS Code I'm pretty good to go.


When your browser is shipped via a snap and is 2 versions out of date because the update mechanism sucks and has been failing silently for over a month, it makes a difference.

There's my personal anecdote.


Firefox through snap has been the last straw for me as well. Not quite enough to ragequit on the spot, but next time I have to install a new OS, it won't be Ubuntu.


I like the security/privacy promises of options like snaps. It seems like other issues, like file sizes, aren’t the worst. And getting it to match your os options seems like a solvable problem. Could somebody explain why they hate these systems?


I dislike snaps because they introduce inefficiencies and I don't want want applications to each bundle their own copies of the shared libraries they depend on. I also don't want automatic sandboxing.


They live in the past of outdated security models.


why do you install it from snap? I'm using ubuntu and don't install from snap most of the time.


It's the default now.


Yup, and installing Firefox via apt installs a snap as well. I manually had to add a separate apt repo for Firefox alone. I seem to have to do this more and more for things that just can't be slow on my machine.


Yep, I did the same. But I don't want to mess around with hacks like that any more, so my next distro isn't going to be Ubuntu, even though I've used some Ubuntu variant for over a decade now. I'm looking at Tumbleweed for my next distro.


Good for you I guess, but most features I need aren't offered by web apps. Paradoxically, Linux is the only platform where desktop apps are the default.


Linux still has its fair share of electron wrapper "applications"


There are some, but nothing of real importance (to me, YMMV). There are no electron-based applications that I use.


> The world lives out of the browser

Exactly: my productive environment is «out of the browser» and I want it to be as fitting as possible, for my efficiency and comfort.


Imo package managers/repos, update cycles, and installation process can still be a reasonable differentiator between distros. Admittedly these decisions are fairly minor -- most popular packages are available on the major repos and you probably aren't installing your distro every day. But even though most the time I'm just living in nvim and Firefox, if adding or changing something becomes a chore it can really expand quickly as I might avoid making a positive change to my system just because I can't overcome the initial inertia from having to bend my distro to my will. Then again, that's probably a sign that I should swallow my pride and switch from Arch to Manjaro at some point.


I didn't care much about one distro vs another until I found a lot of packages I wanted were packaged for Arch Linux and not Ubuntu Linux, and the Arch Wiki was better than Ubuntu's docs. And also, yes "Snaps" were annoying.


I still use applications and my file system.


> The world lives out of the browser

Your world does, and I know that it does for many. But mine absolutely doesn't -- there isn't anything critical I use that is browser-based. And many are like me.

Different strokes and all that.


Agree. OSes are practically irrelevant. The only thing I need is a web browser and a terminal with posix like commands. I can (almost) get that on Windows these days.

I’ve run Mac for 20 years now, and before that Linux for almost 10. I can’t think of anything I lost when switching beyond focus follows mouse.


One of the downfalls of Linux Desktop, besides the fragmentation, was Apple and Microsoft figuring out that a large majority wants a POSIX like experience, and aren't that deep onto GNU/Linux anyway.

There is a certain irony when the Linux Desktop is on minority when looking around laptops at FOSDEM.


You also need some form of window management, and if you like tiling windows, Linux has the most options by far.


If you miss focus follows mouse and like tiling windows, i3 and sway both have that option.

Others might too, those are the only two I have experience with though.


That's one of the jobs of Finder. And no, I don't like tiling windows.


Some people run servers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: