Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eldenwrong's commentslogin

Anarchy would be great and the chances of that are extremely small. I think you mean a total surveillance fascist dictatorship


Anarchy would be great? Anarchy would be Somalia - warlords and armed gangs. I don't want to live there.


Imagine going outside of your house and engaging in voluntary interactions the whole day. A horrible horrible world.

Thankfully the government and police make everyone behave due to the threat of violence. What would we do without them!!?

Anarchy doesn't mean no rules


>Anarchy doesn't mean no rules

That is exactly what it means...


Not really but I understand that the word is used like that by people who haven't spent 30sec looking what it actually is

It really means no government or central authority dictating arbitrary rules enforced by violence.


Why are russians punished for the sins of their government? Should americans get the same treatment then?


> Why are russians punished for the sins of their government?

Because they are participating in this governance. Countries bear responsibility collectively for their actions. And yes, absolutely Americans should be held to the same standards.


Easy to say when your government has committed worse atrocities and you've never suffered for it


It’s true that I’ve never personally suffered for any of the bad deeds of the US government. There are several reasons for that, some nakedly political, but for the most part because when someone in the US government does something horrible it’s not officially approved nor is it accepted and lauded by the people.

Take Abu Ghraib, clearly wrongdoing on the part of the government. The folks involved were exposed, prosecuted, and punished. The revelations of the incident kicked off a top down investigation of how military interrogations are performed and a public report on the matter. Politicians were unseated and hands on perpetrators were imprisoned.

Contrast that with the current situation where Putin receives widespread support from Russian people for committing war crimes while invading Ukraine and the perpetrators were rewarded. I cannot think of any “worse atrocities” the US has committed in my living memory.

There are arguably several situations in US history that should have led to prosecutions that didn’t, such as how we behaved regarding Iraq as another commenter pointed out. I do bear responsibility for that with other Americans, but as you have pointed out we did not suffer the consequences, mostly for political reasons.


Weren't most americans supporting the "war on terror"?

And weren't all your president approving drone strikes on kids and families for decades?

The level of propaganda that americans consume is not to different to the one of russians.

Ofc it didn't help that Ukraine was harboring entire Nazi battalions.

Just think if China was putting a military base in the mexican border and Mexico hired Nazis to fight for them. What would the international response would be like? Not too difficult to imagine eh?


Ah okay, you're not legitimately criticizing the US, you're a Russian troll. I see. You played your hand a little too strong there.

Ukraine was not harboring "Nazi battalions". The US has never intentionally targeted children with drone strikes. Both of these things are ridiculous to even state.

The news media in the US absolutely engages in propaganda, however it's usually for the benefit of the wealthy, not so much for the benefit of the government. In the US, you get unedited access to news from around the world, it is a trivial matter to read Channel NewsAsia (from Singapore), Al Jazeera (from Qatar), or Der Spiegel (from Germany) in English on the Internet, all of which are much less friendly to US policy interests globally and are more than happy to write scathingly about US behaviors abroad.

Good luck to you.


Ever heard of the Azov battalion?

Oh sorry the US does it constantly by mistake. Its just stuck on a loop.

As if the government and the wealthy weren't extremely closely related. One even might say "twins"


What about Venezuela? Should its citizens be punished for Maduro's actions?


That was exactly the anguished complaint of my friend in Australia, who is trying to help his family - and with whom he actually does not see eye to eye on the war situation (they are pro or at least acquiescent, he is adamantly against). But they have no money and he wants to help. Just rereading our thread from last year where he says "yeah, they're Zed patriots, they are also sure that their government is fighting global Nazism and global USA hegemony for the betterment of everyone, but should they go hungry because of their beliefs?". My answer was "yes".


Respect for your honesty about both the situation and in answer to your friend.


Not too different from americans believing the war on terror was about freedom.

Did they get any sanctions? Nah


Always a nice thing to tell your friends.


It's just a spelling mistake.


Nope, this individual has been commenting for years on Ethereum stories, and been corrected multiple times.


Yes but it would have been much worse without the vaccine


My aunt died of covid. Luckily she was vaccinated and triple-boostered, or it could have been worse.


Do you not understand how statistics work? She had a lower chance to die, that doesn't mean she's immune.


Yeah cause this type of vaccine doesn't provide immunity and the protection lasts a couple of months at most. Not to mention that repeated doses are started to be weakening the immune system


Wrong, wrong, and wrong. You can't just believe everything you see on the internet.


The vaccine doesn't provide immunity. It doesn't prevent transmission, just lowers it. This is well known. It may lower sickness severity in older population. It also only lasts 2-3 months.


To be fair I think it was actually right, right, and wrong.


There was a recent paper published in Nature that shows this. Only observed in people who had breakthrough infections though


Of course. I believe the Science.


Doesn't sound like you do if I'm being honest with you. Sounds like you believe the science that agrees with you.


I am a true believer in the Science.

Are you questioning my faith?

The Science Pope doesn't like to hear such heresy. Better watch out or else he'll sic the Science Inquisition on yo' aess!


Uh most vaccines did offer pretty good immunity and an extreme reduction in transmission

They are not in the same category at all


Because the crypto space are just scammers. They barely know anything

People working on Bitcoin are very aware of this and it has been extensively discussed this in the last 10 years and taken into account even by Satoshi


Are there still reserve requirements in the UK? The US removed those


Don't buy bitcoin, buy my shitcoin

Its faster! Its new! Its more advanced!


You realize that your comment is spam here right?


>"Blockchains by definition are immutable post-finality."

This is the greatest misunderstanding. Immutability is NOT a property of blockchains. Its a property of Bitcoin and possibly Ethereum through PoW/PoS


Could you explain what you mean?

As I noted, "by definition" a block that has reached finality will not be removed. Any attempt to add, modify or delete transactions or blocks prior to this point would be self-defeating because it would be automatically rejected.

Yes, newer blocks can be forked out of existence before they reach finality, which is why only blocks that have reached finality are deemed immutable.


Side effects of easy monetary policy and low education of the wealthiest population in the world.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: