Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | elcritch's commentslogin

This is for porting an existing project. It’s an ideal case for LLMs. The results are still pretty different for building up a library from scratch.

However this changes the economics for languages with smaller ecosystems!


Checkout the Nim-loony repo in the paper folder for the pdf.

Ah right, in the nim repo, not the authors one. Contains https://github.com/nim-works/loony/blob/main/papers/GierschE... indeed, thank you

Seems like an electric vehicle that could serve as an electricity backup might actually be more useful for you than not.

That's a need that can also be met with a towable trailer that locks up tools, carries batteries, and supports panels for charging, eg:

* https://www.solarbatterywarehouse.com.au/solar-battery-shop/...

In an emergency you can leave the house in regular vehicle leaving trailer behind to power the freezer.

In other times it's handy for powering tools away from a main supply.

It's also a honeypot of nickable stuff so it'd be good to invest in quality locks and towball / wheel locks.


It also appears this Herman law allows “no knock” search warrants, which in the US are generally considered more serious and more restricted.

American Southerners say “ain't half bad”.

It would be convenient to have an unwant in common English. However plenty of children manage to express their utter -10 want of vegetables rather too well. ;)

You could try Codex cli. I prefer it over Claude code now, but only slightly.

No thanks, not touching anything Oligarchy Altman is behind

I was looking for this comment. For example Microsoft Teams and Office 365 make me feel something, but it’s not joy.

I feel bad for the poor souls that are forced to work on software like that. It surely can't be fun

I never worked at MSFT, but I did work on a few extremely popular consumer-facing products across big tech that had a negative reputation. One product was super hated feature of a bigger and well-loved service (literally "why can't I turn this off") and the other was perceived to be super useful but poor-quality. I think I can understand the experience of those MSFT employees. They know the reputation, and they're sorry, but they need to work, and everyone fights with the product team.

At the former, I started right after school and was baffled no one I worked with ever used our product. I found it super demoralizing to build something so heavily used but unpopular, and eventually I quit out of frustration. I tried to change the product, and improve features, and frequently met with our product and UX people to no avail. We existed, of course, because sometimes popular free products need to serve business goals (thankfully not ads at least).

At the latter, we just had the challenge of building a complicated product, and with millions of users, you'll always get complaints. I had coworkers who would check reddit every morning and share all the complaints people had and really took it to heart. Of course, we could never properly debug or do anything for these random users, and "at scale" a 0.00001% error rate still meant a lot of disappointed people. It was still pretty demoralizing after a while but at least we could say people found us useful, even if it wasn't "fun".


They might be sadists having the time of their lives. There are few better opportunities in life to get away consequence free with causing pain to a huge amount of people, than working on Microsoft Teams. Not only get away with it consequence free; they're even getting paid for it!

I have not met a single softie who defended the decision to make ctrl shift c the shortcut to start a call in a group chat when ctrl shift v is paste unformatted.

Especially given that the teams client doesn't allow disabling or editing keyboard shortcut.

Microsoft employees may be lazy but unlike Facebook employees (I refuse to call it meta), I don't think they are evil.


H1-B visas? Their alternative surely isn't better.

A favorite tidbit I learned years ago was that the Chinese invented Law and Order genre pretty much before anyone else. Very much an establishment wins genre.

Here’s the Google summary:

> Early Chinese detective stories, known as gong'an ("court case") fiction, emerged from oral tales and plays during the Song Dynasty (960-1127), featuring incorruptible magistrate-detectives like Bao Zheng (Judge Bao) and Di Renjie (Judge Dee) who used clever deduction, forensic logic, and sometimes supernatural elements to solve crimes.


I recall reading some research which indicated that daily dosage resulted in slightly better protections against cancer. Though better than not taking it at all.

I just got more 5000IU at Walmart which was a nice surprise. Normally I take two 2000IU tablets.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: