Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dudeinjapan's commentslogin

> IBM to acquire OpenAI (Rumor)(bloomberg.com)

Ouch. Well it is Gemini I guess :D


Nation states can fire missiles at your space datacenter, bruh.

Or just triangulate any signals being sent to it, and fire missiles at the source.

Or just blast it with a laser...

There was one in Hakone, Japan which opened in 1999 and closed in 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_The_Little_Prince_in...

It was one of my fondest memory of my first travel in Japan, we had no clue that such site was there, so when we took the bus from whatever train station to the onsen hotel, and we passed in front of it, as a French, it was jaw dropping to see such place. Even crazier was when we actually visited it, they really captured my home region. Unbelievable experience.

Oh, it closed? That's too bad! We visited it when we were in Hakone in 2017—it was a remarkable experience finding it in Japan!

Yeah but AI can also generate a picture of any cake you prompt it.


I was expecting an excerpt from the Anarchist Cookbook


This YouTube video is missing a Kavinsky soundtrack.


Dependabot only suggest upgrades when there are CVEs, and even then it just alerts and raises PRs, it doesn’t force it on you. Our team sees it as a convenience, not a draconian measure.


the wheel --> chariots, pottery (see Sumeria), Roman roads, siege weapons (play Civ!)

bicycles --> police forces, see the Japanese in Malaya 1941

sewing machines --> factory labor, mass production of clothes

hand tools --> Guild systems

musical instruments --> organized religion, national anthems, cultural soft power

open radio bands --> policing, surveillance

blacksmithing --> weapons

etc. etc. we can do this all day :)


This is exactly why we shouldn't use KKScript either. Plus it has 1-based array indexes.


Ruby::Box in its current form seems to radically miss the mark. Any namespace paradigm only has utility if it is widely adopted across the ecosystem. Javascript did this with ES modules 10 years ago--it IS possible--but it takes a ton of buy-in and effort from the community to achieve it.

I just don't think Ruby has this "burning need" to have namespaces/modules/erm... "boxes". So we're likely to end up with sporadic usage of Boxes leading to inconsistent behavior.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: