$7 per 1000 searches seems steep. Don't think I will sign up to something where I have no idea if I'll make money, considering I'll also be sharing the commission with you.

Thanks for the feedback. We felt that $7 is reasonable. With an average online order value of $180 and average commission of 5%, you need to make just 1 sale in every 1000 to earn.

yes, really expensive. I would pay something like USD 0.01 / 1K requests... and even then, privacy and data ownership (even of queries themselves) is serious concern. especially you are just scraping other websites and re-selling their data. so why would I trust you with my data and funnel then?

Would you share more about what data you'd be concerned about here?

all of it

Wow. That steep indeed

The Pro account is only $20/month and works with Claude Code.

I learned about it from this thread and will buy a month's worth to keep playing with it. (48 hours ago the documentation said it was only supported for Max.)

I received the e-mail exactly 15 hours ago:

   Hello,
   
   Your Pro plan just got way more powerful with three major upgrades previously available only to Max, Team, and Enterprise users. 
   
   Claude Code is now included
   
   Claude Code is a command line tool that gives you direct access to Claude in your >terminal, letting you delegate complex coding tasks while maintaining full control. You can now use Claude Code at no extra cost with your Pro subscription.

yes, it changed yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44179604

Not quite. You pay ala carte for it with API pricing.

The $100/mo max plan lets you use a Claude Code with a fixed bill. There’s some usage limits though.

They add Claude Code to the pro plan yesterday: https://x.com/_catwu/status/1930307574387363948

Ha! That’s what I get for hallucinating using two day old data.

I'm not sure an x.com link to a GIF really helps clarify the status of Claude Code on Pro plans. Here's the actual anthropic docs on it: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11145838-using-cla...

Can relate. I built a little web utility back in 2009. Did practically nothing with it (occasional updates every 2/3 years) and it slowly accumulated inbound links and google ranking. Then finally in 2019 I decided to put a bit more effort into it. Now I make my living from it! :-)

What is your web utility, if I may ask?

Are all those formats for decompression and compression done purely client side?

What library are you using for the client side compression? Or did you make your own?

Yeah, it's all client side. Which is why I was able to just leave and forget about it for so long. Was hosted on an S3 bucket. There's tons of libraries out there that does client side compression/decompression. Just search through github! :-)

> You mention making living from it. Can you tel me your MRR?

You're thinking of Agilent. Also Accenture didn't change their name due to Enron. It happened before the scandal (so quite lucky for them!) Arthur Andersen and Andersen Consulting were involved in a legal tussle which required them to change their name... https://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/08/business/worldbusiness/IH...

I like that I can embed a bit of vue code into an existing web page. Bit like old school javascript. AngularJS 1.x was like that too and the inspiration for Vue. React/Angular require a whole build process with NPM/webpack etc etc to create a SPA.

Theres an interesting product over at kickstarter. Seems to be getting a quite a bit of traction. Beacon with a whole bunch of different sensors. All open source! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/463050344/ruuvitag-open...

Thats a dumb argument. Boeing still makes 747s, which is the same age.

but boeing also launched the 767, 777 and 787 in the intervening decades.

you have obviously never driven/ridden in Russian car :). Otherwise 747 comparison would never cross your mind :)

You're comparing apples with tuna

After you've watched The Room, read "The Disaster Artist: My Life Inside the Room, the Greatest Bad Movie Ever Made". It is a fascinating tale! (And is being turned into a movie of it's own starring James Franco)

Just the sort of tool I'm after! Been using Gimp to open PSDs but it's quite finicky and error prone. I can't justify myself a Photoshop license just for inspection purposes.