I wont add on to the technical aspect of the discussion, but this whole article is "its easier and its faster and its less expensive for you!!", a data-harvesting tactic having been done for years. Please think, people. I get the security aspect, but this technology gives up an astronomic amount of personal freedom - even if vendor lock-in is somehow eliminated - and biometric data.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Biometric data is only stored on your device. Logging into an app or website with a passkey just uses bog standard asymmetric crypto (public/private keypair). Also a lot of thought was put into the WebAuthn standard (an open standard) to make sure it can't be used as a tracking vector.

Please think. The biometric data is on-device. This is, in very simplistic terms, public key cryptography where the private key is locked to a device. How that device is authenticated is immaterial to passkey authentication to another service.

Well yes, partner country's corporations intelligence, your intelligence.

I dont think reputable alt-coins with liquidity could turn into 11mil->700$ in an hour, so i consider it pretty safe to assume that 11 million wasnt actually 11 million: it doesnt matter if nobody wants it. Nevertheless, great work on processing such emotional burden.

It's a great story but what makes me question it is the idea that any altcoin exchange from 10yrs ago ran for more than a year without getting "hacked" and/or outright disappearing.

Where did you get 10 years from?

In another comment you said this was 3-4 years ago, and by that point apparently this had been running "several years", which one usually takes to mean 3 or more years, so in total 7-8+ years ago at least, which I rounded up to 10.

For what it's worth, I'm not accusing you of lying, I'm making a tongue in cheek observation about altcoin exchanges.

It does seem like you are stating the MTM valuation (i.e. spot x notional) without mentioning liquidity, which is where the confusion from others is coming in. It's very possible to accumulate a large position in a low liquidity altcoin that you will have zero hopes of selling for that valuation, even over time.

Ah, yeah, I can see that. I wrote the initial code in 2018ish, re-discovered it just before covid, IIRC.

> It does seem like you are stating the MTM valuation (i.e. spot x notional) without mentioning liquidity, which is where the confusion from others is coming in. It's very possible to accumulate a large position in a low liquidity altcoin that you will have zero hopes of selling for that valuation, even over time.

I'm not 100% what those words mean, but if I'm understanding you correctly, this 11 million was if I could sell it for in a perfect universe. It wasn't the actual price I could sell it for ... obviously, that was about $700.

> I'm not 100% what those words mean, but if I'm understanding you correctly, this 11 million was if I could sell it for in a perfect universe. It wasn't the actual price I could sell it for ... obviously, that was about $700.

That's right. So you may have accumulated 11m HN coins, but the market for them is dead except for 1 exchange where a pump n dumper is the only person offering to buy any. They are currently paying 1 USD for each of them, but they are only willing to buy up 700 HN coins at most. MTM is 11 million USD but liquidity is only 700 USD.

So your story is perfectly possible, but without stating liquidity it's unclear which number you meant when you said $11m unless people are familiar with the markets in which case it's obvious you meant MTM. Most people would expect min(MTM, liquidity over reasonable time frame), though.

Non-American, simple answer: political tool.

I wonder how many site operators are aware of the underlying issue with leasing your site to CF, how much false positives and false negatives Cloudflare has, and if there are any alternatives.

the archive website didnt write that article nor do they fund it. Their business model might be ridiculous, but they pay their reporters using that.

And? We're here discussing an article most can't access otherwise. Why give them this?

Find another source.

Hey, is the loading screen implemented by the game itself or does dotbigbang measure and provide that? In the latter case, could you make it so it shows progress? Im no web designer but i think its crucial in rather resource-heavy settings and/or the potential of old devices.

Thanks for the feedback, the loading screen should show progress in a bar in the middle of the screen so I’m interested to know what you’re seeing specifically.

There isnt any progress for me on mobile, its just boxes cycling and a loading... text underneath. Perhaps it has something to do with content blocking?? Im not sure.

Thanks, sorry it’s not working properly for you. If you have the time it’d be great to know what device and browser you are using and is there anything non-default about the setup? On desktop it can be hard to account for all the extensions people load into their browsers which tend to cause issues occasionally but usually that’s not so much of a problem on mobile. You could also try loading in incognito.

> There will be few people with the dedication to benefit us all > The Unity move was VERY silly considering the state of Godot and Unreal

In my opinion, opposite, Unity just pulled its oligopoly strings. It wasnt bad management or desperate business choices; they knew the state of the industry.

If they knew, why then did they need to adjust their fees after initial announcement? Looks like the management is pretty disconnected and desperate to me.

Its completely the freedom aspect for me. Sure, Apple wont let me down because that would impact their business, but what if they did? Its also a thousand times better to be 100% sure you can modify your electronics without any fear of getting rejected like its vehicle insurance.

I see two futures ahead: one with "free" content (data harvesting) remaining alive through remote attestation, physical key verification, phone verification etc. and one with completely paid and exclusive communities scattered around with only a few percent being able to access a meaningful amount of information. Maybe both. But things dont seem to be as bright as some AI lovers make it to be. Hopefully im just being unrealistically pessimistic and open governance prevails, somehow.