Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | deadlydose's commentslogin

Couldn't you just fly low so that you'd be within the energy weapon's dead zone? I mean it doesn't look as if it can target anything flying at a depression less than 0°. Seems a few cheap fiber optic drones with a mortar lazily strapped to it and flying low could easily render this useless.


Or swarm it from 6 directions at sub 0° depression.

I'd love to know how this isn't blinding everyone in the area tasked with operating and protecting this system.


No it's not, it's never been about hackers except in name. It's about startups and venture capital. Always has been. Doesn't invalidate the point you are trying to make, though.


Should they not be lighthearted and optimistic? Or did you leave a comment just to vent some of your personal grievances with a dash of JAQing off?


> i wouldn’t visit the US even if i though i was perfectly safe

That's certainly your right and I get where you are coming from but

> our enemy.

Calling the US your "enemy" is a pretty strong stance, especially considering how deeply tied our countries are economically and culturally.

Don't want to visit? That's fine, but let's not pretend for a second that every American supports all the things you oppose. Only a plurality, not a majority, of Americans even voted for Trump and more than 75% of us still consider you an ally.

But you might want to lay off the media and tone down the rhetoric and drama a bit. Shit like that is why things are the way they are now.


> You would blame the hammer or at least the manufacturer if they claimed the hammer can do it al by itself.

I wouldn't because I'm not stupid and I know what a hammer is and isn't capable of despite any claims to the contrary.


I'm rather anti-Apple but even I enjoy John's site from time to time. Hell, I had to vouch for this post just to see it. I can't think of any legitimate reason for his content to get flagged as often as it does and it's been happening for years.


> initiated by the US

While I don't approve, didn't the EU charge the US tariffs that were twice as high as what the US charged the EU?


You can take a look at the slightly out-of-date import duties here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tariff_ra...

To summarize, EU countries levied 1.49 % on average on imports in 2021, the US levied 1.48 % on average. Probably there are singular items that diverge from this average.


> While I don't approve, didn't the EU charge the US tariffs that were twice as high as what the US charged the EU?

I'm afraid i'll need the exact sections of the trade agreement document that stipulates these tariffs so that I can compare myself. Otherwise this is hearsay for me.


I am not aware of such. My intuition is that it was relatively balanced (taking services into account, where the US is big due to Google, MS, and friends).

But I stand corrected if there are some good sources.


I don't usually reply to replies but I was asking because I'm not sure. About a decade ago I was looking into the 'Chicken tax' and went down a tariff rabbit hole. A cursory search now is quite difficult due to all of the recent news and changes. And also millionshort seems to require an account now to do advanced searches. So about the best I could do is ask ChatGPT for a chart comparing average tariff rates by sector for the US and EU before 2016. But I'd rather not.


> For the average European

Depends how old you are, I guess:

- The Palmer Raids (1919-20) - WW2 internment and deportation (1942-45) - McCarthy era (all of the 50s) - Present day

Each one seems to have deported random people. Many of whom did nothing wrong.

And honorable mention:

- Fallout from the Iranian hostage crisis (1979-81)

That last one didn't involve Europeans, per se, but it did deport a lot of innocent people. And for a bonus, here's the ~30yr pattern of anti-immigration:

- Immigration Act of 1924 - Operation Wetback of 1954 - Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 - Present day

These things have _always_ happened here. And some of them even follow a pattern.

Edit: Sorry for the formatting.


> Why do you speak for them?

Why do you?


They were never stranded, that's why anyone with half a brain isn't outraged.

Or maybe the astronauts, who themselves stated they weren't stranded, are big fat liars. Personally, I'll take them at their word.


Okay stranded might be the wrong phrase but not being able to get home for 9 months doesn’t seem like the right outcome for a 10 day itinerary to me. I’m glad everything is working out the end though.


They were able to get home, NASA just decided to move them into a standard rotation which the Astronauts were obviously okay with.


"not being able" is just another way of saying "stranded" again.

Please read up on the details of this adventure and you'll come to realize that whoever is putting this phrasing into the media is trying to lie to you!


It's a "holy shit, two cakes" situation. I don't think anyone who's devoted enough to being an astronaut to go through all it takes is going to mind more time in space doing space stuff.


I'm sure they appreciate the extra time in space, but remember they live human lives as well. They're both married, and Butch has two kids.


Anyone with half a brain would know just how dangerous this situation was, but you're just projecting.


How was the situation dangerous. Please explain.


bone density loss ? Permanent osteopenia ?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: