Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cobrien's commentslogin

It's oddly amusing that a similar outage occurred exactly one year ago, 17 April 2012: http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/17/2954949/gmail-outage-april...


Hey Gibbon -- I'm not sure what catamaran you were looking at, but the America's Cup boats are actually even LARGER than that ...

The AC45 (the boat being used in current cup events while the larger AC72's are being designed and built) uses a 21.5m (71ft) wing ... and the boats that will be used in the actual Cup (the AC72) are even larger beasts -- a wing 40m (131ft) tall [1].

The design of and technology going into these AC class boats is fascinating. It's been a lot of fun watching the AC45's race and the AC72's will be quite a sight out on the water once they begin pushing 'em to their limits.

[1] http://www.cupinfo.com/en/americas-cup-2013-boats-ac72-ac45....


Yeah I got the numbers from a local newspaper article.

It was definitely the AC72 that we went to see.. it was launched in July and completely towered over all the over yachts and surrounding buildings.

The numbers, I guess, are from the AC45 that was launched months ago. Looks like the numbers weren't accurate, but that's the NZ Herald for you.


I haven't researched the full contract award or pulled a copy of the original RFP, however, work on the Census FactFinder website was part of an $89.5mm contract awarded to IBM Federal in 2007 (for, potentially, 9 years) [1]. I wonder if the $33mm quoted in the FOIA request response is the total cost incurred to-date on that award (including services performed for the entire Statement of Work) rather than the actual cost of ONLY building/updating FactFinder.

I wouldn't be surprised if the $33mm price is correct ... but not 100% sure it is without spending more time looking around and, potentially, seeking further information through FOIA.

[1] http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/22467.wss


Good point, and thanks for digging that up.


It was changed, yes -- and there was already a previous comment to this submission discussing it (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4163318) ... and it was killed. I'm disappointed in the continued editing of submission titles as well.

[Edit] And now the referenced comment has been un-killed. :-)


If comments like mine are being killed just for pointing out flaws, I guess I should turn on showdead before I start blabbing!


> There was a similar HN post/Google+ post last week. I can't remember where I read it. Something along the lines of an avid lawyer decided to kill her account because she read the ToS and drew exactly the same conclusions as what you had just wrote.

The relevant article and HN discussion is here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3660323


Another example of a payroll system implementation gone awry: SAIC's CityTime in NYC [1]. $700mm+ now ...

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/nyregion/bloomberg-adminis...


Wrong domain -- it's http://www.obvious.com (and still around)


Ah. Seems he didn't update this post then: http://evhead.com/2006/10/birth-of-obvious-corp_25.asp as it links to obviouscorp.com


I believe, and IANAL, in California non-competes are not enforceable anyway. Ref: Edwards vs. Arthur Andersen


The UserScape people did a brief post on this earlier in the year:

http://www.userscape.com/blog/index.php/site/comments/how_to...


Minor correction, UserScape is a one man army, Ian Landsman.


That's the one I was thinking of. Thanks for finding it!


Should be able to come!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: