That's a lot of nots. So you are saying that Dennett says that the brain might be reducible[1]?
I don't think that's a strong claim or that it even qualifies as a claim at all. Lots of things might decompose into simple components if subjected to the right analysis, very few things definitely won't - for example many clever people have spent a great deal of time attempting to reduce quantum and cosmic scale physics to simple intuitively founded laws... If Dennett's claim is that the human brain is the same order of object as the universe I can accept it only if we agree that all objects share the same order. Where does that get us?
[1] Apologies, I don't know what reductible means, but guessed typo - I'm open to education though and unworried by typos!
Way to go with your whataboutism, nobody claimed it was solely Islamic. It's disingenuous to equate current state Islam acceptance of homosexuality with current acceptance in Christianity. You just want to inject "I'm not a racist" signal.
How is this sexism? It's extremely inappropriate and it's a shameful behavior, but the definition of sexism is not "anything that makes a female uncomfortable".
No cultural Marxism is applying Marx ideas of class warfare to other areas. Basically, separating the population along an axis and calling one group oppressors and other oppressed. It haa nothing to do with changing the status quo.
64 GPU's and 91 hours for a 12 second simulation. 64,000 CPU's for 910 hours (1 month) is 4 orders of magnitude.
Unfortunately, a useful cell simulation would be far more complex than simple particle collisions and a much shorter step size. But, that's not to say different kinds of simulations can't be useful. And ASIC's or general improvement in computing power can also boost things.
