Though my Erlang skills have long atrophied, this book was my intro to functional programming and helped me understand recursion. It’s been a while since I’ve read it but I remember it being kind of funny as well as informative.
I recently took a Waymo back to my hotel in Phoenix after a few drinks and it was a really pleasant experience. It didn’t take the freeways but it navigated the surface streets pretty much perfectly. It helped that it was about 25% the cost of an Uber at that time.
I know this video is humorous, but it’s also kind of touching. After watching, I started taking random measurements in my field notes book and had a really nice time.
I will eventually read through this because I have a reasonably good handle on Python/Go, but don’t have any experience with Rust. This book will help me focus on the parts of Rust that I am most interested in given my current InfoSec work.
I worked for a brand that was heavily impacted by phishing sites that used LE certs. It was annoying, but honestly I wasn’t sure what LE couple do about it. If you deny creating a cert with Gmail in the domain, people will just use something like gmall instead.
Many fishing attacks could be thwarted if there was a more manual process for certificate issuance, CAs were obligated to KYC and verify/monitor applicants stringently and lost their license for malpractice, etc. Web would be a safer place, but the cost is higher barriers for entry, and attackers would just focus on stealing the actual certs.
Some would say being able to communicate privately/securely is irrelevant to whether you should trust whoever you’re communicating with, but then someone could argue that in practice the two get conflated all the time and the aura of the channel colours the counterparty.
I notice that there are two most common categories of non-techie users: those for whom being able to visit a website without loud warnings is enough to auto-trust it, and those who by default distrust anything that has to do with anything on the Web (and the latter are unfortunately correct). You can’t expect people to perform sophisticated threat detection at all times and feel good about their life at the same time.
I think the implication is that if a kid buys a toy they will have something tangible that they can play and interact with, but tipping/donating to a streamer doesn't provide that.
The skilled people I know who work for the US government usually are very mission driven and/or working towards a pension. For foreign governments, people tell me they like the stability.
The sad truth is that no one is getting a promotion to staff for just maintaining a service.
I wish this wasn’t so. At a previous job I had a VP tell me that my team was like a public utility and I took that as a compliment. Later my boss explained they were saying that they only noticed my team when something was broken. Sort of explained my lack of career progression in retrospect.
