Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | biff1's commentslogin

I remember some similar threads. They seem to be utilitarian.


Because westerners are out numbered or because we embrace an ethic that is self deprecating? Connect the dots.


Because the conventions that are considered “standard” evolve over time to match the most common usage. Non-western English is probably already the most common English, due to India alone. Those speaking patterns have been relatively isolated so far, but online media brings it into the mainstream. My main claim is that it will take over the present “standard” usage, because of the sheer quantity (but not in an alarmist xenophobic way, lol).

Some examples that have become normalized for me personally, I think due to working with lots of international folks in tech:

- “i have a doubt” instead of “i have a question”

- “i will not claim X” instead of “i would not claim X” or “i don’t claim X”

- “this is not as X as compared with Y” instead of “this is not as X as Y” or “this is not X compared with Y”

- "it will anyways be fun" instead of "anyways, it will be fun"

I’m not sure if these are broad patterns, or just peculiarities of the specific crowd i hang with. And I don’t think these are standard usages yet, but I’ve become familiar enough that I say these sometimes, despite intuitively feeling that they are wrong.

Edit: i think most of the phrases i have adopted are from Indian English, but unsure.


I sometimes remove articles from sentences because my English is very far from perfect, but I tend to be wordy, and want to cut down word counts.

For example

  // this doesn't work because of LanguageService bug, see #123
instead of

  // this doesn't work because of a LanguageService bug, see #123


If it’s the quantity, wouldn’t people just drop English all to gather? (I’m not a proscriptivist for the record, but I do like some non-English languages more than others. Hopefully that’s not too verboten to confess here lol.)


I don’t think it’s verboten! I prefer Turkish over French.

English will certainly continue to evolve, and eventually it may be dropped altogether. But for example, you couldn’t understand English as it was spoken in the 1400s. It is different enough that we have a separate name for it, “Middle English”. Many of the changes languages undergo are influenced by interacting with other languages. There’s no reason to believe English will stop now.

As to why English will probably keep evolving instead of being totally dropped — it is now the lingua franca for most of the world. It would be unlikely to “just drop” the most useful language 90% of people know.


What is the point of learning after all? Is it to get a job? Is it human development? We have to answer this before pondering what ai means for schools. I don’t see much agreement to be arrived at. It’s a religious conundrum.


Well, if you are making the assertion, which you implicitly seem to be, you must first define thought. Is a word == thought? And of correlations, we all know the adage about correlation and causation. Not that I would make the counter argument, that thought is not encoded by electrical signals, but I would bet you aren’t totally correct. Do you think there will be no future paradigm shifts?


I think we may not be disagreeing much…

Agree fMRI doesn’t tell us for sure what information is in electrical activity. I only mean to imply it’s suggestive.

But we still can get a lot of information from electrodes. Do words count as thoughts? I’d say so.

Definitely don’t think electrical signals are all there is to thought.

They’re definitely part of it, but I think time will show unlike with computer parts, it’s hard to make clean separation of responsibilities in the brain.


Friends don’t let friends NPM.


Wish they gave some examples. Not really worth the read.


You get what you pay for might be one argument against such a policy.


Since the 60’s people have wanted to revise the nurture side of psychology to downplay the role of mothers, but the reality is as everyone has always known, it is the mothers. Sure, there’s also biology and trauma. But Iften the trauma is related to interaction with the parents. Also, biology is shared most of the time by the parent, so bipolar mothers tend to have bipolar children.

Anyway, people have mothers before they have friends. Our first relationships become a template for subsequent ones. I feel embarrassed for the authors and the field more generally that such an obvious fact is not obvious enough to prevent absurd claims. As with most things in our society, blame the 60’s and all that came from it.


The problem is that taking certain psychotropic medications changes your brain chemistry. It’s not as simple as it sounds. It’s not like trying on shoes. The brain is dynamic and drugs alter it, as does life experience, talk therapy, disease, aging, etc…


That’s a statement of fact, but not intrinsically a problem. Being alive changes your brain chemistry.


There’s a bubble bubble and it will pop in 26.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: