Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bargle0's commentslogin

What kind of hobby do you have where you’re spending $10k/month?


I see you've never heard of Warhammer 40k


I see you haven't heard of SLA printers


How impure was the gold dust from the chemical supply company?


Spheres optimize for minimum sogginess. Kellogg could change the marketing angle without changing anything else to be correct.

Maybe. I haven’t done the math.


I want a sequel to Lego City Undercover with the building and driving mechanics of Lego 2k Drive.


Lego City Undercover was so good. It's one of the only game I have 100% completed. My kids and I spent many hours just goofing off in that world. I'd love to see a sequel.

One thing I like about it is it's not a third party franchise. I like that it doesn't bring any outside culture or baggage. It's self contained humor and storytelling.


Is a cannon really a firearm? Was this for an individual, or is it a crew served weapon?


That's up to you.

One of ways the ATF defines a firearm is "any weapon that can be converted to expel a projectile using an explosive."

If you don't WANT it to be considered a firearm maybe it's sufficiently corroded such that it's no longer true that it could expel a projectile using an explosive, and therefore is no longer a firearm. In that case, if you hit someone with it, it goes back to being an armament, but no longer a firearm.

That is of course unless you melt the metal down and turn it into some kind of lower receiver. It would go back to being considered a firearm by the ATF.

Whether or not it's a firearm depends on your context. If you and all your friends disagree it's a firearm, in that context it is not. In other contexts it is.

Words are really just illusions though. It's equally true that there are no firearms, because firearms are just words. It also is true that any and all matter is a few steps away from being a firearm. Where do you end and I begin? If we get quantum mechanics into it, maybe everything already is a firearm.


This was made before 1899 (or whatever the cutoff date is), and it’s black powder. The ATF does not consider this a firearm.


Pedantically, it would be considered an "antique firearm". Still a firearm, but basically unregulated


> (3) The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.

according to the law antique firearms are not firearms.


And at one time a 14-inch long shoestring with a loop at each end was a "machinegun."

https://web.archive.org/web/20050313043608/https://jpfo.org/...


That’s an incredibly biased reading of that. It’s the gun + 14” of shoe string attached to the trigger enabling automatic fire that’s the machine gun not the string on its own.


No, this 2004 letter specifies that the string with loops on its own, because it was designed to be used to modify a rifle to fire automatically, was a machinegun.

Three years later, in 2007 the ATF decided differently, "Upon further review, we have determined that the string by itself is not a machinegun..."

https://everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/01/25/shoestring-machine-...


Black powder deflagrates, it doesn't detonate (explode.)


this is probably the best thing I have ever read on this cursed platform. thank you


I'm glad you liked it.


When the daily microdose isn't so micro


Not on drugs, I just happened to read the Perfection of Wisdom Text that Cuts Like a Thunderbolt a few years ago and I guess parts of it really stuck with me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


> Was this for an individual, or is it a crew served weapon?

FTA: “Sometimes referred to as a wall gun, the unearthed cannon was an early type of firearm requiring two people to operate. Designed primarily for use along fortification walls, the expedition reportedly utilized them as an offensive weapon to breach wooden or light adobe walls of domestic dwellings in the cities they encountered.”

Wall gun: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_gun


Yes, a cannon is a firearm. The "arms" bit has nothing to do with human limbs, it's from the Latin arma.

A firearm is anything that uses an explosive to propel a projectile, so it can be "fired".


It is. The US defines a firearm as "Any weapon... which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive" and definitions in other countries are similar. Both a pistol and a ship-mounted cannon are firearms.


I thought if it uses black powder it isn't (federally) a firearm? IIRC felons can own black powder guns, you can have them shipped to your door, etc


Cannons are legal to own, which is a little wild


To be fair, it’s hard to make a 2nd amendment argument that doesn’t allow private ownership of muzzle loading black powder cannons.

They haven’t exactly featured prominently in drug land/gang movies either.


US federal law excludes antiques from this, antiques being defined as 1898 or older.


Well it goes boom and it’s roughly shaped like a big stick, so it’s big boomstick! Boomlog?

This is my boomstick!

https://youtu.be/881Dr4lMey4?si=sOW7Py_jQejicprM


Yes for all senses of the word. Moreover, first firearms were really hand cannons on a stick. Look at the picture in the article, it was a rifle-sized weapon mounted on a swivel.


> Sometimes referred to as a wall gun, the unearthed cannon was an early type of firearm requiring two people to operate.

The article claims it is a firearm.


A firearm, if sufficiently old, is not a firearm per the ATF.


As you’ve illustrated, it depends on the definition you choose for a given term.

That may also depend on who you ask and in what context.


Definatly not a firearm.


I think the application for this is to return some dignity and independence to people who have physical trouble washing themselves. Of course the form factor of the 1970 prototype wouldn’t do that, but that can be fixed.


There was a similar (contemporary?) Japanese model shared on here a few days ago, which was basically the same sans ladder. As long as there's nothing to stumble over on your way in, and it's not too hard to get situated in the chair, one of those would be amazing for people with mobility issues.

There was a New Yorker short story I read years ago about an elderly woman in a nursing home, and this wasn't the point of the story at all, but the main thing I remember is how the woman wanted to live with her daughter until her daughter pointed out that assisted/accessible bathing would be impossible in the daughter's tiny apartment shower.


It fills with (hot) water up to the neck, which feels like a huge risk for unattended disabled people


[flagged]


You’re right, and I’m sorry for not being more specific. I was thinking of people who have trouble washing themselves, since that’s what GP was talking about.

I’ll be more mindful of the diversity of disabilities in the future.


Must be a sad world living in a state of permanent victim hood


I would be mightily surprised if the independence of disabled people were even a thought in the 70s.


Their hardware is cool and bizarre. It has to be seen in person to be believed. It reminds me of the old days when supercomputers were weird.


Don't leave us hanging, show us a weird computer!



Who gets to decide when the camera gets turned off in the restroom?


I figure it doesn't. It never gets turned off. What's decided is who gets access to the record. It's encrypted and there's legal stuff.

If you have a reason why it's bad then just say the reason. Don't ask insinuative questions.


No one should be watching fifth graders go to the bathroom. “Legal stuff” is not adequate.


That's pretty damn weak.


In my experience, when schools are graded on bullying incidents, administrators avoid reporting at all costs. This program isn’t enough if there are disincentives to reporting at higher levels.


I wonder if similar results could be had by cooking the potato in clay or a salt crust.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: