Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | b40d-48b2-979e's commentslogin

    The main issue is highways and rural roads.
Source? I'd wager most accidents happen where the most people are. Cities.

> I'd wager most accidents happen where the most people are. Cities.

Sure, in absolute numbers. But..

In the US, highest deaths per 100M vehicle miles:

1.79 - Mississippi

1.73 - Arizona

1.72 - South Carolina

And the lowest:

0.56 - Massachusetts

0.70 - Minnesota

0.78 - New Jersey

Or, highest per 100,000 population:

25 - Mississippi

25 - Wyoming

21 - New Mexico

Lowest per 100,000:

4.9 - Massachusetts

5.7 - New York

6.5 - New Jersey

Maybe the average MS driver drives 3-5x as many miles as the average MA driver? I doubt it. Something else happening there.

https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/deta...


Fortunately deaths are only a fraction of the accidents though, and it's not even necessarily the kind of accident that bothers insurance companies the most as long as the driver only kills himself.

It seems we are talking about different things.

The majority of car collisions happen on urban roads where the majority of cars are.

The majority of fatal collisions occur on rural roads, where vehicles are travelling faster.

I live in the UK.

https://www.simplyquote.co.uk/insights/where-do-most-car-acc...


None of those things are "AI" (LLMs). We had those things before, we'll have them after.

I don't know that they will be. Millennials and Zoomers aren't lead poisoned.

    Sam Altman ... I mean, just the accusations are so cringe
Yeah.. sexually assaulting your sibling is "so cringe".

I feel this comment can apply to 80% of the content that gets posted anymore.

You know what else entitles you to two tons of lumber? Cash in the amount of two tons of lumber. That transaction even goes into a database for the business reporting.

That relies on a third party to maintain the value of the currency. Maybe I'd prefer to minimise my dependence on third parties. The crypto ecosystem makes it much easier to trade six cows for two tons of lumber and offload all of the exchange risk to speculators. It still can't enforce the physical exchange of goods, but it can atomically negotiate a swap from anything to anything through as many intermediaries as required. With a suitable transaction fee — which may come out of the transaction inputs.

A cryptocurrency system can negotiate that my six cow NFTs (which are not jpegs, I guarantee they are exchangeable for cows) for two Ethereum, of which 0.05 is taken as a fee and 1.95 flows on to Uniswap to buy Home Depot coin which buys two tonnes of lumber at a specific location and time. Except oh dear — Home Depot only trades on Polygon. Well then my 1.95 ether is bridged to Polygon where my 1.94 wrapped ether is traded for 9999999 POL and then for Home Depot coins. Or I buy wrapped Home Depot coins atomically on Ethereum and then unwrap them back to Polygon.

Crucially it all happens automatically.

That infra doesn't exist since cows and lumber aren't being traded on a blockchain, but it's the kind of thing that could be enabled.

Since I only hold ETH, WETH and POL during the transaction, their absolute value doesn't matter.


You just replaced one currency with at least three and who knows whether it's a company-store type situation or rugpull where suddenly the currency has zero value.

That was not a journalist.

You managed to say absolutely nothing in your comment.

    Compare the same category of car in gasoline and EV versions.
Have you looked at the bulk of cars people are buying new? They're $60K+ trucks and SUVs. Those same people could be buying EVs today.


I did say something about SV lattes didn't I? Not everyone is over there.

Plus how much is the EV version of a 60k usd truck? 75k? More?


They already bought the car.


I'm wondering whether it's a generational vision and that the concept of ownership of software with hardware is slowly becoming obsolete.

Every young adult I know uses a subscription for everything I used to buy. Even though they own the device on which they consume it.

Spotify for cd's, Netflix-Disney-Amazon for vhs and dvd's, Udemy-Masterclass for books.


CDs were around $16 in 2000, which is equivalent to around $30 today, which is around 2.3 times what a Spotify premium subscription costs for one person.

Equivalently, a Spotify premium subscription in 2000 would be a little under $7.

I guarantee that if you asked young adults in 2000 if they would be interested in a subscription that lets them listen to nearly everything available on CD, at any time, as often as they wished, for $7/month they would have been ecstatic.

Same for DVDs, which were typically in the $20-25 range for new releases in 2000. They would not have been quite as happy as they would have been with Spotify because of the way video is split among several streaming services, but it would still be seen as a tremendous improvement.


Yes, despite knowing that it's not included. It's like hitting yourself and complaining afterwards about it


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: